The 70-300 also has this problem. Just point at a distant object and AF before you put it away.
Thanks for this tip!Save me much hassle of switching focus:thumbsup:
The 70-300 also has this problem. Just point at a distant object and AF before you put it away.
Great..I'm glad I managed to stave off buying the sigma and tamron 70-300mm.Good(Im a newbie so cant get technical) and the IS is quite good(4 stops).
However,one minor niggle is that when the AF is activated the lens will not be pulled back(its a push-pull lens) completely and there will be abt 1cm+ of the lens protuding out.
You will have to flip it to MF to pull it back to the minimium position.
i think your tiger sample exhibits motion blur. :think:
i think your tiger sample exhibits motion blur. :think:
Should be freezable. Just need to up the iso and shutter. But this will not exhibit the power of the IS unless probably if you shot near the telephoto end.
PhotoZone's test report & review for this lens is up. Check it out: http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_55250_456is/index.htm
The review mentioned here seems to point out that 55-250 IS has problems with the IS....
What is the shutter speed needed to freeze motion?:dunno:
maybe the "new" type of IS don't work that well for longer focal length?
:think:
Do you have the Exif data that you can copy and paste here?
Does this lens has problems with IS? According to photozone.de it certainly says so... Maybe 55-250mm range is really too much to ask for? Or maybe it's the body? Anyone with a 40D has this issue?