1 fps difference is no big deal. It isn't that noticeable. If you compare say 10D to 1DII, yes that is quite significant.Snoweagle said:But if u compare 20D to 30, the 20D's continuous shooting speed is 1fps faster than the 30.
1 fps difference is no big deal. It isn't that noticeable. If you compare say 10D to 1DII, yes that is quite significant.Snoweagle said:But if u compare 20D to 30, the 20D's continuous shooting speed is 1fps faster than the 30.
n0d3 said:Ok, your posts are starting to irritate me a little. First you say something, which implies something and then change your mind again and say something else.
In this case, you said "BUT the 20D shoots 1fps faster than the EOS 30", implying that the 20D isn't a good suggestion. Which I then ask you whats the point, which you then reply by saying that faster=better which is exactly what I've said and has nothing to do with your statement from before. Then you go on to say other redundant things, like in reply to Tim, "So that's perhaps why a full frame covers everything.". Its the same with the EOS 3 on the other thread.
Garion said:1 fps difference is no big deal. It isn't that noticeable. If you compare say 10D to 1DII, yes that is quite significant.
n0d3 said:Oh well, theres nothing I can say that'll change your view of things. Another sad day in ClubSNAP. i believe Garion knows what I'm trying to say though. :bsmilie:
Snoweagle said:I know what u mean bro but i'm not trying to start a war on the gd ol' Canon EOS systems. But ultimately it all comes to the decision of the thread starter.![]()
n0d3 said:Oh trust me, its not whether XXX camera is better than YYY camera. Its about you, the way you answer/reply and your redundant posts.
Snoweagle said:To the above 2 posts. It's essential. Since both of u are like that then i won't waste my time commenting too.
n0d3 said:Ok, your posts are starting to irritate me a little. First you say something, which implies something and then change your mind again and say something else.
In this case, you said "BUT the 20D shoots 1fps faster than the EOS 30", implying that the 20D isn't a good suggestion. Which I then ask you whats the point, which you then reply by saying that faster=better which is exactly what I've said and has nothing to do with your statement from before. Then you go on to say other redundant things, like in reply to Tim, "So that's perhaps why a full frame covers everything.". Its the same with the EOS 3 on the other thread.
Belle&Sebastain said:its not us, it your post, you still dun understand.
crescent_sf said:So can I say that 20D and 30D have almost all the same functions that I can get from EOS30 ?
By the way, does 20D and 30D has eye control ?
What the the current price for both model ? And if I want to sell my Elan7e (mine is a US model) .. roughly what is the market rate for a 2nd hande model ?
Thanks in advance for all the help![]()
n0d3 said:Yes. The 30D has spot metering though. No digital EOS bodies have eye control at the moment. The 30D has just been released to replace the 20D, the only difference being spot control/picture styles/larger LCD/etc. can check out the 30D thread somewhere. 20D brand new now is around $2200, you can get it for about $200-400 cheaper 2nd hand in B&S. With grip, your camera should sell around $300-400.
I like this reason:bsmilie:Moonstone said:1. Very close to EOS 30 by putting a D behind
crescent_sf said:Thanks for the info
You mentioned, 'with grip', do you mean the grip from the additional battery pack ?