V
vince123123
Guest
Please read the part about balance of probabilities again.
And I'm not saying that it will be 100% read as a pornographic term - but you can't deny that that possibility exists that someone (and indeed some have) read it that way.
So if there's a shoot which says "Shoot Live Sex session - S$50/person" and a face shot of a beautiful model is depicted - by your reasoning, there won't be anything wrong since a photo of live sex was not depicted.
And I never relied on the wiki definition in any part of my posts.
And I'm not saying that it will be 100% read as a pornographic term - but you can't deny that that possibility exists that someone (and indeed some have) read it that way.
So if there's a shoot which says "Shoot Live Sex session - S$50/person" and a face shot of a beautiful model is depicted - by your reasoning, there won't be anything wrong since a photo of live sex was not depicted.
And I never relied on the wiki definition in any part of my posts.
sequitur said:well if so you say, based on the wiki definition (yes i'm over 18 and over 21 in case anybody wants to shoot me down), he shouldn't be showing a model, he should be showing what a brazillian creampie is - as according to the wiki definition, which i suppose by any standards should look the same worldwide, unless you're dysfunctional (spelling?).
and so in context, he showed a model rather than the wiki definition. so adjust the context to what he means then... according to what you're saying.