Dezmund Soh
New Member
Hi everyone!! I just got my D90 a week ago...
and loving it!!

hi and welcome!Hi everyone!! I just got my D90 a week ago...and loving it!!
Hi everyone!! I just got my D90 a week ago...and loving it!!
can't say without knowing the situations and subjects you intend to shoot, and most importantly your budget.Hey noob here...
Should i get the 70 - 200 or 55 - 300?
Hey noob here...
Should i get the 70 - 200 or 55 - 300?
appleshem said:70-200mm f2.8 would be best, but it cost 2times more then the 55-300mm.
personally will choose the 70-200mm f2.8 over a 55-300mm if money isn't the issue.
but then again, it depends on what you wanna shoot.
Hi everyone!! I just got my D90 a week ago...and loving it!!
Hey noob here...
Should i get the 70 - 200 or 55 - 300?
Welcome!Hi guys,
New member reporting in.
Just got my first DSLR a day before New Year 2011. :bsmilie:
Anybody has a 50mm 1.4D on your D90?
I just got one but I'm really disappointed. It's not sharp at 1.4, not even 1.8 or 2.2. It's only sharp at 3.5 and I guess onward from there. But I bought it for the 1.4! I've used a 50mm 1.8 before and it was sharper than 1.4. It's ridiculous pricing at such a price when a 1.8 is much cheaper.
I bought it from a mass seller so there's no chance of me exchanging for another copy. The main damper is: I bought it intending to use for CNY and my friends' babies and it is not working as well as I'd hoped.
Darn 50mm 1.4D!
![]()
please get the word 'incompatible' out of your mind. It's not applicable in this case.Hey thanks there!
I was wondering if it's because D90 is a DX and 50mm 1.4d is an FX lens and thus the incompatibility which results in the less-than-effective use of lens, so I was hoping to find someone else who has a D90 and also having this problem.
If it's really the lens itself, then Nikon should scrap it. How can still sell - and at a few times more than its better counterpart? It makes me feel like a fool paying more for inferior quality.
Hey thanks there!
I was wondering if it's because D90 is a DX and 50mm 1.4d is an FX lens and thus the incompatibility which results in the less-than-effective use of lens, so I was hoping to find someone else who has a D90 and also having this problem.
If it's really the lens itself, then Nikon should scrap it. How can still sell - and at a few times more than its better counterpart? It makes me feel like a fool paying more for inferior quality.
You sure it only costs twice as much?Where har?
Anyway I would personally choose to leave this lens at home if I was going on holiday. Imagine needing such a big bag just to fit in this "little bamboo cannon".
55-300VR is much more portable.
So really it depends on intended usage.