TS is different person... I think TS here is Smiles88. :bsmilie:
oops.. my bad.. =

TS is different person... I think TS here is Smiles88. :bsmilie:
+1:thumbsup:
If cannot take people's criticism or correction... best is not to make mistakes. :bsmilie:
I did not think the responses were hostile? Nobody scolded him or de-meaned his existence, nor did anyone hurl personal insults his way...
emo sia. :bsmilie:
Aww okay. emo me. but well, still I made an honest mistake and my apologies for being so blunt.
let's move on . . . shall we ?
Please PM me the place for the get together, i may be able to join in . . . trying to change my schedule for my work . . .
Thanks alot.
Aww okay. emo me. but well, still I made an honest mistake and my apologies for being so blunt.
not trying to put Nissin down, because I think they've done a great job to produce an SB900 competitor at a much lower price point.
But apparently (from some websites), Nissin have overstated the power of their flash. I need to search for the site, but I remember reading that the GN was actually lower than SB800.
The things I like about the 866:
- good price
- wireless commander/slave with iTTL
- sub-flash unit (which may or may not be useful)
lolx.. where got poison you? i was merely trying to help u make a more inform decision.
anyway... Di866 is almost comparable as SB 900.
Pros
Cons
- Cheaper by half the price
- A little more powerful
- ETTL
- Wireless Trigger
- Bound Card
- Recycle time a little slower than SB 900
- A little harder to find diffuser as its a little bigger than SB 900
- Its 3rd party
For more details of DI866. Click here for the full technical specification
Well it doesn't affects the image quality, just see the dust makes me feel so uneasy. Hahaha...
Anyway the brushing technique I found on Youtube, mirrors is alright but not the sensor...
How can I set my d90 t iso 100?seem t lowest I can find is 200...
Btw,when n where u guys gonna meet?
Thx
i think it's Lo1 or Lo2...something like tat...
manual got write...
Turn further and you can get L0.7 . . . L0.3 and then your L1.0 (ISO 100)
Cheers.![]()
Not much point to go to ISO 100, because it's below the camera's base ISO of 200, and you actually get a poorer image as a result. The dynamic range is reduced at ISO100 compared with ISO200, and that's NOT a good thing![]()
Not much point to go to ISO 100, because it's below the camera's base ISO of 200, and you actually get a poorer image as a result. The dynamic range is reduced at ISO100 compared with ISO200, and that's NOT a good thing![]()
i think L1.0 is not genuine ISO 100, most likely rendered by ISO 200 by reducing the brightness. it's better to set ISO 200 than L1.0
Not much point to go to ISO 100, because it's below the camera's base ISO of 200, and you actually get a poorer image as a result. The dynamic range is reduced at ISO100 compared with ISO200, and that's NOT a good thing![]()