D7100 User thread

[Weiwu Lah]

Looks very impressive! any (ex) D7000 users here? Is there a Mark improvement from the already very decent D7000? Thank you for sharing!

 

[hawthorne907]

Looks pretty sharp to me. However I kind of feel the shadows are a little harsh. Not sure if it's just me though.

 

[koppite]

Looks very impressive! any (ex) D7000 users here? Is there a Mark improvement from the already very decent D7000? Thank you for sharing!

Just wanna be practical here. For pictures, if you don't print 8R and above, or you only view pictures on PC, there is basically no difference at all between the 2 models. In fact with most cameras for the matter, including the D4. You will see differences when u blow up to 100%, and yes the D7100 is slightly better, but not a heaven and earth difference. It did not matter to me as I don't do billboard prints. So for those of you who are hoping for having better images after getting this, you will be disappointed. There is a slight improvement in ISO performance too from what I see, again not a heaven and earth difference.

The D7100 size is bigger than the D7000, it is much closer to the D600, in fact they felt the same to me (D7100 n ad600). The 1.3x crop works like a charm and is certainly a great function on the D7100. There is no deterioration in IQ when using that mode, and I am very happy with that.

What you will likely appreciate more is the video function. It is way way better than the D7000. You will notice the difference almost instantly, probably the best among all Nikon DSLR now. However I will think most don't do video on a APS-c camera. If this was on a FF, adding the ability to change aperture in LV, it will definitely sell like hot cakes.

End of the day, I felt that I am buying more into technology upgrade and not performance upgrade for this model as I don't do videos. Do I regret? Hmmm, I downgraded from FF, so do feel quite a bit, especially in the area of ISO performance. (About 2 stops difference, but I was already prepared for it). Overall I like the camera though, it's without a doubt the best APS-C camera I have used.

 

[Weiwu Lah]

Just wanna be practical here. For pictures, if you don't print 8R and above, or you only view pictures on PC, there is basically no difference at all between the 2 models. In fact with most cameras for the matter, including the D4. You will see differences when u blow up to 100%, and yes the D7100 is slightly better, but not a heaven and earth difference. It did not matter to me as I don't do billboard prints. So for those of you who are hoping for having better images after getting this, you will be disappointed. There is a slight improvement in ISO performance too from what I see, again not a heaven and earth difference.

The D7100 size is bigger than the D7000, it is much closer to the D600, in fact they felt the same to me (D7100 n ad600). The 1.3x crop works like a charm and is certainly a great function on the D7100. There is no deterioration in IQ when using that mode, and I am very happy with that.

What you will likely appreciate more is the video function. It is way way better than the D7000. You will notice the difference almost instantly, probably the best among all Nikon DSLR now. However I will think most don't do video on a APS-c camera. If this was on a FF, adding the ability to change aperture in LV, it will definitely sell like hot cakes.

End of the day, I felt that I am buying more into technology upgrade and not performance upgrade for this model as I don't do videos. Do I regret? Hmmm, I downgraded from FF, so do feel quite a bit, especially in the area of ISO performance. (About 2 stops difference, but I was already prepared for it). Overall I like the camera though, it's without a doubt the best APS-C camera I have used.

Thank you very much for taking the time to share your experiences and putting things into perspective I really appreciated that. I don't really do video on my D7000. I tend to use it for wildlife (birds) and normal walkabout /event shoots. I'm more interested in the 1.3 crop mode, more pixels (can crop more ) and better AF system. So just want to find out if ex-D7000 users feel any clear difference in these aspects once again, thank you very much!

 

[keeper76]

Thank you very much for taking the time to share your experiences and putting things into perspective I really appreciated that. I don't really do video on my D7000. I tend to use it for wildlife (birds) and normal walkabout /event shoots. I'm more interested in the 1.3 crop mode, more pixels (can crop more ) and better AF system. So just want to find out if ex-D7000 users feel any clear difference in these aspects once again, thank you very much!

same here. would like to know from users their inputs regarding the new AF system. IQ and noise handling of the D7000 was already good enough for my needs, so on that area, i wouldnt be expecting much from the D7100. what turned me off was D7000's unreliable 39pt AF, the use of the 51pt AF MULTICAM3500DX is really welcome development plus the bonus of the additional 1.3X crop.

 

[kensou]

Hey guys I have this idea that the 1.3x crop mode is kind of redundant.. if you take the pic at 1x and den crop it yourself to 1.3x isn't it the same? and probably u might lose the area of picture just by 1cm because u 1.3x cropped it?

I know its particularly useful for wildlife that is kinda far away. Any1 can share their thoughts? Thanks!

 

[khock520]

Hey guys I have this idea that the 1.3x crop mode is kind of redundant.. if you take the pic at 1x and den crop it yourself to 1.3x isn't it the same? and probably u might lose the area of picture just by 1cm because u 1.3x cropped it?

I know its particularly useful for wildlife that is kinda far away. Any1 can share their thoughts? Thanks!

...kensou, d7100 is a dx model and with a selectable 1.3dx; in total it gives a 2x crop....which means that for a 500mm lens you are getting a 1000mm reach (35mm format equivalent)..very useful for birding. at this setting, you get about 8.5 mb jpg image (assuming not shooting in raw) and there's plenty to crop...

and the same applies to a FF body with a dx mode to give the 1.5 crop factor.

 

[grievor]

i dont think the d7100 is like a worthwhile upgrade from the d7000 honestly....you might as well save the money to go full frame....but if you want the best Dx camera available in terms of overall features you cant go wrong with the d7100

 

[hawthorne907]

i dont think the d7100 is like a worthwhile upgrade from the d7000 honestly....you might as well save the money to go full frame....but if you want the best Dx camera available in terms of overall features you cant go wrong with the d7100

Somewhat agree since I was in the same dilemma. Went for d600 in the end although handling seems to be weaker compared to d7100. However looking at the pictures I've been shooting, there's just something about the depth and range of colours and highlights etc that makes your pictures seem so much more real and natural. I used to have quirks with how d7000 gave me slightly artificial looking pictures. Of course its just my own opinion though.

 

[Steven Chee]

Hi,

D7000 & D7100 using the same battery grip? Thanks..

 

[grievor]

Hi,

D7000 & D7100 using the same battery grip? Thanks..

Nope they are different

 

[mackie8]

sample pics from an event ...

using sigma 17-50

Camera Nikon D7100
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 17 mm
Focal Length 17.3 mm
ISO Speed 640

Camera Nikon D7100
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 36 mm
Focal Length 36.7 mm
ISO Speed 640

no editing...

 

[Keith37]

...another pic with same combi; but set to 300mm (1.3dx)

Nice good capture with the combo.

Personally, I find that it is not easy to get a sharp picture of the red panda using the D7100 with 150-500mm.
1) these creatures move too fast. They are like on red bull.
2) lighting in the enclosure. The 150-500 is not really a fast lens.
3) the staff will chase you away after 15 min.

 

[Keith37]

Just wanna be practical here. For pictures, if you don't print 8R and above, or you only view pictures on PC, there is basically no difference at all between the 2 models. In fact with most cameras for the matter, including the D4. You will see differences when u blow up to 100%, and yes the D7100 is slightly better, but not a heaven and earth difference. It did not matter to me as I don't do billboard prints. So for those of you who are hoping for having better images after getting this, you will be disappointed. There is a slight improvement in ISO performance too from what I see, again not a heaven and earth difference.

The D7100 size is bigger than the D7000, it is much closer to the D600, in fact they felt the same to me (D7100 n ad600). The 1.3x crop works like a charm and is certainly a great function on the D7100. There is no deterioration in IQ when using that mode, and I am very happy with that.

What you will likely appreciate more is the video function. It is way way better than the D7000. You will notice the difference almost instantly, probably the best among all Nikon DSLR now. However I will think most don't do video on a APS-c camera. If this was on a FF, adding the ability to change aperture in LV, it will definitely sell like hot cakes.

End of the day, I felt that I am buying more into technology upgrade and not performance upgrade for this model as I don't do videos. Do I regret? Hmmm, I downgraded from FF, so do feel quite a bit, especially in the area of ISO performance. (About 2 stops difference, but I was already prepared for it). Overall I like the camera though, it's without a doubt the best APS-C camera I have used.

If you do not always shoot with a FF body, the trade-off in weight is awesome. In fact, I tend to pack my DX cam over my FF one when I go for travel. The D7100 would make a good capable body for travel. The video is a good add-on for travel too. You never know when you need to take video during travels.

For the 1.3 crop, it would give more reach to the longer lens, and I really like the function. One thing to note, if you shoot raw, the small buffer size in D7100 would be a concern. I tend to shoot JPegs and will mostly load my pictures online, so I am good with it. A few years ago, I switched to do most of my processing in-camera using picture control. This free up time during post processing. Shooting JPEG also use less storage place (like it matters now with all the cheap 1TB drives).

Shooting RAW does have its benefits and we need to weight our options to see what make the most sense to our shooting preferences. Having said all these, I still holding on to my D300 as it is would not fetch much in the 2nd hand market. It is a good back-up in case I need higher fps and a large buffer for RAW.

 

[Keith37]

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

sample pics from an event ...

using sigma 17-50

Camera Nikon D7100
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 17 mm
Focal Length 17.3 mm
ISO Speed 640

Camera Nikon D7100
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 36 mm
Focal Length 36.7 mm
ISO Speed 640

no editing...

Very nice colors, esp when no editing is being done.

 

[grievor]

here are some of my high ISO test shots taken with the nikon 35mm f1.8g(plastic fantastic)

1/40ƒ/1.8ISO 1600

1/25ƒ/1.8ISO 1600

1/30ƒ/1.8ISO 1600

 

[mackie8]

Did u manage to get screen protector for the LCD?

 

[xtemujin]

I'm thinking of getting one to replace my trusty D90 for travels.

How is the stock situation?

 

[DM101]

here are some of my high ISO test shots taken with the nikon 35mm f1.8g(plastic fantastic)

1/30ƒ/1.8ISO 1600

This shot is great ! :thumbsup:

 

[grievor]

This shot is great ! :thumbsup:

thanks! =D