ageha said:But makes totally sense.
Still interested myself but only if the issue gets solved soon.
even tho the dust issues bothers u, but u r still interested in d600. Im quite curious what draws u to it? Care to share?

ageha said:But makes totally sense.
Still interested myself but only if the issue gets solved soon.
I don't really understand your question. Anyway, Nikon lenses and I need a light full-frame film back for it. Who would have guessed that. Any alternative?even tho the dust issues bothers u, but u r still interested in d600. Im quite curious what draws u to it? Care to share?![]()
ageha said:I don't really understand your question. Anyway, Nikon lenses and I need a light full-frame film back for it. Who would have guessed that. Any alternative?
Zaknafein said:What i mean is what features of d600 interest u...
Well if u wan nikon then this is the lightest and smallest FF there is![]()
None, the D600 has zero outstanding features.
ijnek said:lol.
dun b too uptight abt the oil/dust issues.
since Nikon has admitted it and there r ppl who have gotten the shutter replaced, go ahead n get 1 and start shootin.
sure, it might b troublesome to go back to the NSC, but my experience with NSC so far has been ok...
He asked me and for me it has none and doesn't need any. Jeez... Some people don't even bother to read the thread.
daredevil123 said:Saying in general brother, don't get worked up. Not talking about you. Why so upset? If you don't need it, why keep on focusing on this and trash talk about it? Life is short, go out and smell the roses. Do something that is worth your time.
Most of the time it is the photographer who is not outstanding.
But the D600 is a entry level consumer level FX camera. The most outstanding feature is the price. Never before have FX been available to the masses at such prices.
But people still complain. Because everyone wants fresh, wants cheap, wants big big. Like how they should have put a 51pt AF into it, how it should have this or should have that. The thing is, are you willing to pay more if those features are in there? And if you are, then there is the D800 or the D4...
Most of the time it is the photographer who is not outstanding.
But the D600 is a entry level consumer level FX camera. The most outstanding feature is the price. Never before have FX been available to the masses at such prices.
But people still complain. Because everyone wants fresh, wants cheap, wants big big. Like how they should have put a 51pt AF into it, how it should have this or should have that. The thing is, are you willing to pay more if those features are in there? And if you are, then there is the D800 or the D4...
:thumbsup:
要便宜,要新鲜,又要大大粒?!
As the minister said.. cheaper better faster :bsmilie:
Cool, a general comment addressed to nobody. Fair enough... Where did I trash talk the D600? I want a D600, I have no reason to trash talk it. Maybe you haven't noticed the title of this thread.
daredevil123 said:Maybe you should not get the D600, since you sound so negative about it. You should just get something that you will be happy with.
You are negative. It seems you can't stop complaining about others. You still haven't answered the question where I trash talked the D600. Don't make things up just to justify your reasoning.