V
vince123123
Guest
Seems like the only advance is the large MP rating. Everything else seems to lose to the D3. I'm happy with my D3, D3x not needed at all.
Seems like the only advance is the large MP rating. Everything else seems to lose to the D3. I'm happy with my D3, D3x not needed at all.
some sympathy for those who don't have a D3 already... pls... :cry:same thoughts as vince..
still very happy with my D3.
some sympathy for those who don't have a D3 already... pls... :cry:
with the current price,it's like buy 1 D3 n get a 2.8F lens free compared with what we paid when it 1st came out.lol..
i feel now is the best time to get a D3 for those who r eyeing it.
Interesting.. what is the market price for D3.. is D3 going to compete with the Canon 1DsMkIII or the 5DMkII.. I cant really make the difference reading the specs..
Just saw the full specs - I'm right, only the 24MP wins. Everything else is equal to or lousier than the D3. Slower frame rate, lower ISO etc.Ihoped to see a high flash sync speed but well was disappointed.
Just saw the full specs - I'm right, only the 24MP wins. Everything else is equal to or lousier than the D3. Slower frame rate, lower ISO etc.Ihoped to see a high flash sync speed but well was disappointed.
same thoughts as vince..
still very happy with my D3.
Seems like the only advance is the large MP rating. Everything else seems to lose to the D3. I'm happy with my D3, D3x not needed at all.
I feel quite frustrated at all these comments. It really shows ignorance. But it's a typical mindset, to always only compare numbers. Big equates to good, small equates to bad.
D3 is catered to sports, photojournalism - hence it's high fps, low MP count and high usable ISO
D3x is for studio use, advertising (medium format backup or replacement) - hence it's high MP, LOW ISO
so please, think about what you want to use it for before saying "lose to" this "lose to" that. The D3 base ISO is 200, can be boosted to 100. D3X has ISO 50. Once again, different purposes.
If you want 9 fps for sports, get the D3. You won't be needing 24.5mp anyway.
I'm even more frustrated at the stereotypes that D3 is for sports and D3x is for studio.
FYI, I've been using the D3 for portraitures, both outdoor, and indoor - the low MP helps alot in fast processing and I don't see why anyone needs more than 12MP FF.
The D3 helps also when I go out to take events, having higher ISO and faster fps. Note, I do not take sports.
I do admit that the D3x wins in the low ISO department, but one stop hardly justifies the extra price tag. That is in fact, the ONLY feature that I'll be using if I go for the D3x.
YMMV.
actually there's a clip showing the printing enlargement quality of a nikon D700 and 135mm film base camera .. I forgot the link .. those got it maybe can share share ..
the print size was amazingly big billboard .. Nikon D700 at 12mp is so good liao la ..
maybe Nikon D3x is for picture biiboard which can cover a fifteen storey building lo ..
he he ...