5DMK3 has how many MP again? this will definitely confuse the consumers, good move by Nikon
D3200 is out !!
- Thread starter Eaglehorn
- Start date
5DMK3 has how many MP again? this will definitely confuse the consumers, good move by Nikon
so many of our bro here have their hands on a D800, now how about a test, if i had one, i will test all the lenses that i have (not many)
Yupe..many who are new still believe or think that the higher the MP..the better it is (infact MP is all they care).
D3200 is entry and at its price.. i think its cool.
D3200 is entry and at its price.. i think its cool.
i would like to see a side by side shot of this little camera and a mirrorless
how much bigger is it
how much bigger is it
Look like this time Nikon DX entry level can be kill all the M43 user.
Especially to Fujifilm x-pro1
Especially to Fujifilm x-pro1
the x-pro1 targets quite a different market from the D3x00 range.
The entry Canon & Sony DSLRs would be the best/closest comparison.
niteblu said:
Ha ha sound like a bit sad on Sony user, cause the sensor is made from Sony but Sony DSLR is not selling as well.
But in the manufacturing in sensor they just earning in big pocket money from Nikon side.
Who say Sony DSLR is not selling well? Actually they sold very very well... and that is the case for the NEX series of mirrorless camera too.
And also people who go for mirrorless camera had their own ideas and needs, not that Nikon came up with a big MP entry level camera, that it will suddenly kill off all competition.
X-pro1 is no slouch either. After using it, I have to say, ISO performance is at least on par with FX D700 if not slightly better. Details are excellent... and the lenses... OMG the lenses are very very good especially the 35/1.4 and 18/2.
Check out the pics I shot with the X-pro1 here:
http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/reviews/1076271-fujifilm-x-pro1-review-production-release.html#post7860540
Last edited:
Well done to Nikon for their great market research team! For many years, PnS cameras have started from 3megapixels to the recent 12 megapixels, and this is what PnS user will look at each time they upgrade their camera. And with this new 24 megapixels entry DSLR, they will be able to attract new PnS user to upgrade to DSLR.
But just to warn new DSLR user who wants to go for this camera, think properly, higher megapixels means bigger file size, and means bigger capacity SD card, need to upgrade HDD and computing power. But what is the purpose of a large megapixel photo if the only thing you do to the photo is to post it onto Facebook or if you print the largest size is maybe 8R? Do you really need the large file as how many of the new DSLR user can afford a photoshop software, and how many of them wants to spent time to do photo editing?
I really find that there is really no reason for buying this camera, as you are going to spent more money on storage, and computing power.
Just my personal opinion. I am still a strong Nikon supporter, I am waiting for a D7000 upgrade, I want more video features upgrade to it, hope Nikon see this... haha... thank you.
But just to warn new DSLR user who wants to go for this camera, think properly, higher megapixels means bigger file size, and means bigger capacity SD card, need to upgrade HDD and computing power. But what is the purpose of a large megapixel photo if the only thing you do to the photo is to post it onto Facebook or if you print the largest size is maybe 8R? Do you really need the large file as how many of the new DSLR user can afford a photoshop software, and how many of them wants to spent time to do photo editing?
I really find that there is really no reason for buying this camera, as you are going to spent more money on storage, and computing power.
Just my personal opinion. I am still a strong Nikon supporter, I am waiting for a D7000 upgrade, I want more video features upgrade to it, hope Nikon see this... haha... thank you.
pic taken by d3200 at iso 1600
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7250/7092821121_9440de5bb4_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7076/7094454461_d748a5b05a_o.jpg
at iso 3200
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7092/6948383490_a3a92d8333_o.jpg
at 80% crop
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7125/6948409892_4236117c3e_o.jpg
at iso 6400
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7280/7094450853_a4371ca856_o.jpg
at iso 12800
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7278/7094448875_e1b1fa7e5a_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7250/7092821121_9440de5bb4_o.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7076/7094454461_d748a5b05a_o.jpg
at iso 3200
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7092/6948383490_a3a92d8333_o.jpg
at 80% crop
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7125/6948409892_4236117c3e_o.jpg
at iso 6400
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7280/7094450853_a4371ca856_o.jpg
at iso 12800
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7278/7094448875_e1b1fa7e5a_o.jpg
Last edited:
There isn't any reason for anyone to accommodate crappiness. If you are crappy, no matter what camera you use, your photos are still crappy. Why not learn to use the camera better rather than think that buying a camera with lower resolution will "cure" your crappiness.
Learn to look on the positive side towards how you can reach your full potential. Constructive.
Learn to look on the positive side towards how you can reach your full potential. Constructive.
Similar threads
