wildstallion
Senior Member
Singapore website just updated : http://nikon.com.sg/productitem.php?pid=895-7b3591c8f7
Wah... Confirm D2Xs.wildstallion said:Singapore website just updated : http://nikon.com.sg/productitem.php?pid=895-7b3591c8f7
I'm still ironing out the issues, the main gripe is the AF module difference which I got a feeling it will be very significant for those that are finding the D2X focusing algo different from the D2H/S.mpenza said:do u guys find it's significant upgrade?
classic.espn said::nono:
D2xs subclasses from obselete D2x, therefore, D2Xs is an obselete replacement that's already obselete :nono:
I'm refreshing the pages :lovegrin:Cheesecake said:classic.
waiting for a proper review from ***!!!
this is call fine-tuning of the shelf product. :bsmilie:Niccon said:Is this going to be a trend for camera manufacturers, to release an update/improvement after a period of time to extend the marketing life of the product? :think:
Just listen to *** :thumbsup:Niccon said:Is this going to be a trend for camera manufacturers, to release an update/improvement after a period of time to extend the marketing life of the product? :think:
Niccon said:Is this going to be a trend for camera manufacturers, to release an update/improvement after a period of time to extend the marketing life of the product? :think:
I don't mind, but I would have preferred a larger gap of improvement than just these adjustments, of which I think most normal consumers not affected or would see any sense to move to D2XS, as replied earlier to mpenza here - http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=199924gooseberry said:This "trend" has been happening since the old days of film - F801/F801s, F3/F3hp, F90/F90x are just some examples - seems to me they have a long history of adding refinements to their cameras, which I think is a good thing. Would you want the camera engineers to stop looking at ways to improve their products ?
Artosoft said:Wah... Confirm D2Xs.
After D70->D70s, D2X->D2Xs, now we can be sure about D50s (and maybe D200s) :bsmilie: :bsmilie: :bsmilie: .
Regards,
Arto.
espn said:I'm still ironing out the issues, the main gripe is the AF module difference which I got a feeling it will be very significant for those that are finding the D2X focusing algo different from the D2H/S.
I've other info which shows that it's worth to get (read: upgrade), but from what is revealed so far, the only deciding factor for me is the AF module difference (for tracking).
A very big plus point is the dual function of the "FUNC" button, I've been asking Nikon to add in a 2nd "FUNC button", now they've done it the software way :bsmilie:
The professionals might find the Image Authentication/GPS a big plus. Heard there's a very portable GPS unit for use with the MC-35 too *ahem* (now I know why Capture NX was delayed :sticktong).
I can live without
- 60 continous shots
- EN-EL4a (believe me, trust me)
- Black/White Mode (never needed it)
- 3 Custom Curves (1 is enough and I don't use it)
- Hi-ISO steppings
- New higher better dot-pitched LCD.
- Inbuilt USB2.0 cable (? - I prefer my Lexar FW card reader anyday).
I was wishing for:
- Calibrated ISO-1600/3200
- Additional "FUNC" button
- MM III (But there's an improved MM II already for D2Xs)
Actually, nothing much improved (from a non-professional consumer POV) but for a professional, I believe certain features are worth the upgrade and Nikon probably will arrange for them special arrangement(s). However for the consumer(s), it's not worth the upgrade definitely.
I guess as long as it's Nikon its significant. :bsmilie: this is brand loyalty. If it was from another camp, then it's not a big deal.mpenza said:do u guys find it's significant upgrade?