Padawan said:
A lesson in basic comprehension. You left out the first part of that quote, which I have reinserted:
"The lighter you can travel, the better. I used a Nikon D100 and D70, as they're light-weight, excellent image quality, very low-noise up to 1600 ISO, long battery life (and they both use the same battery) and fairly quiet ..."
Given that the S2 Pro weighs 760g (no battery or lens) vs. the D70 (595g with no batt/lens) AND comes with an integrated vertical grip that you cannot remove, maybe that's one of the reasons why he chose the D100/D70.
I posted the link, I would expect anyone to read the entire article. He did say he like the camera with "excellent image quality", "very low-noise", etc. At a difference of oh 165g, would he bother to take these cameras if they are not good? D100 itself weigh 700g (from DPReview) With the grip, the D100 would exceed the the weight of the D70 by more than 165g; I know, I own one; the MBD100 does not weigh 65g
So the weight is not the only criteria, since he took the D100 as well, right? And also pray tell, where did I compare to S2 Pro on this? :dunno: Show me which post where I mentioned S2 Pro?
For the record, I do heartly agree with Clown and VincentLin on their decision because it is more suitable for what they shoot.
Padawan said:
What's more, you cannot twist his comments around to indicate that he prefers D100/D70 to S2/S3Pro. Where in that article of his did he indicate that the S2/S3Pro even entered the equation? One could speculate all sorts of ungenerous motives behind your rather shabby misinterpretation of his words but since I don't know you i'll leave it at that.
I didn't "twist his comments". I mentioned that the D100/D70 are good cams even the "old" D100. Show me the line where I compared to any other camera.
So. I mentioned no S2 Pro at all; you added that part in. He compared D2H and S3 Pro and then to D2X in the quote below. Which does it want to compare?
Quote at 1855 hrs
"Of course if you want to say is there nothing good about D2H. It is fast in autofocus and buffering memory then fuji S3pro. But not something D2X can't do. At the price I go for D2X. Why get sc**w? Then again the question is to compare D2H to Fuji S3 Pro. If the question go should I get D2H. I say dun get sc**w "
I said: "So, an old model (D100) and a camera that is alleged noisy camera at high ISO used and praise. A 8fps feature that is deemed useless when compared to greater DR."
The "8fps feature" refers to the D2H, just which was dismissed as not important when compared to greater DR.
Padawan said:
I'll finish off with a quote of yours.
Well thanks. I'm not that one who got the basic facts (of when D2H is launched and price of S3Pro US$2499 vs D2H US$1999 where he that the "D2H is more expenise even it is on it way out" - Post #37 1855 hrs ) wrong and go around insulting people with "You are good with word but not math Progess to you, sc**w to me." - posted by Singscott #37 at 1855 hrs.
padawan said:
You seem like a very angry man, Watcher. Why not just take a chill pill and relax? Stop abusing people all the time.
Who started abusing people with insults? I started questioning his assertions (not even facts, mind you), he started to insult and propagate all the wrong info (date, price, etc). I attempted to correct, he didn't even acknowledge that he was wrong. I challenge his assertion. You came in and said I was abusive. Who is being abused here?