Hi Tomcat,
Are these OOC jpegs or converted raw files?
Best regards.
They are converted Raw images.
Hi Tomcat,
Are these OOC jpegs or converted raw files?
Best regards.
The name.
In that case, are their spec comparable or A is better since it's using a DX sensor?
What is the diff btw this camera & Nikon 1?
The high ISO performance is really good. Seem to me to be better than the Sony RX100 and the Fuji X20 both of which tend to depend on image stacking in jpeg mode to produce better results than shooting in RAW mode at ISO 3200.
In that case, are their spec comparable or A is better since it's using a DX sensor?
Coolpix A images in good light...
Not sure if it's my screen, but the pics look a bit 'gritty'? Like they're from a small sensor?
I would think that typically a small sensor would produce mushy outputs of areas in an image with fine details like grass or leaves on the trees or brickwork or windows in faraway highrise buildings, etc because they could not resolve the details. A large sensored camera like the Coolpix A could resolve such details which would be obvious when viewed at 100% resolution but if severely reduced in size like in this case, could cause all these fine details to look crushed together and maybe 'gritty' like what you thought, or looked overly sharpened.Not sure if it's my screen, but the pics look a bit 'gritty'? Like they're from a small sensor?
Coolpix A images in good light...
It's probably due to the severe downsizing and jpeg compression in the posted images. They don't have jagged edges when viewed at 100% resolution.I see jaggard edges. This is especially evident in the 2nd photo. Photos look like they were over shaprened.
It's probably due to the severe downsizing and jpeg compression in the posted images. They don't have jagged edges when viewed at 100% resolution.
Here's a larger version of the Singapore River shot.Can you post them fullrez or at least 2k?