Pardon my ignorance, this is a the question i have been asking myself before i got my first DSLR camera. i hope to hear from you guys of the advantages and disadvantages. As far as i know from the sales person, these 2 are the trusted companies.
so guys share your opinions !
wah .. u all hor ..very bad ler...make the TS paiseh until he's not even replying .. :sticktong
TS..come come .. let fabian kor kor talk to you ...

basically hor it's quite hard to keep scores for both brands .... it might be easier to keep scores if you have a price bracket to start with lor.
For new entry levels around the 1K bracket, u have the ( no preference in naming them ), Nikon D60 or the Canon 1000D lor. Both have fancy features to keep you glued to them, much like a PNS compact camera. If u have used compact camera, these camera offers you a few step up in terms of image quality and creativity at a slight increase in weight. However they are still light enough to dump inside s abag and head off. =)
What I usually share with people hor when they are getting thier first DSLR is to find a 2nd hand ones lor ... just like motor bike, most people will say stop at 2B but 5 years down the road u see them riding a hayabusa lor .... also same with P plate 1st car purchase, always get a 2nd hand one first lor. U never know when u will scratch others or other will scratch yours during parking. hehe
For used ones, there's really quite a number to chose from, like from ( no preference in listing them ) Nikon D40(x), D80, Canon 400D or the quite new 450D. You can find them in the buy and sell section.
The image quality for these camera aren't far from each other even if you nitpick on them and try to decipher. I would say thay with proper holding techniques and a creative eye, you can churn out fabulous pictures even with these cams! =)
For a starter lens , I would suggest getting a lens with some form of stabilization. Most compact camera already have some form of image stabilization build in so your pictures would turn out reasonably sharp when using them. When u moe up to DSLR, you would expect that form of sharpness or maybe even more. Some form of stabilization could ensure that. For Nikon, it is call "vibration Reduction" abbev. as "VR" and for Canon it is call " Image Stabilization" abbev as "IS". :thumbsup:
Also don't fret about the CCD vs CMOS sensor thing, you may hear some telling you some fallacious stories about which is better and which is not; which is more expensive and therefor 'better', why more expensive cameras are using that particular sensor and therefore it produces 'better' images. Some maybe true quoted with a technical background tested with equipments and shooting brick wall, but how many times do we shoot brick walls anyway.
Last and not least after you purchase it, don't compare it with others. It either makes you feels good or feels bad. There are bound to be people who's picky abt your choices. It only shows how superficial these people are.
So as you can see, there any really aren't many advantages and disadvantages between the two brands. You wouldn't go wrong with any of them.
My advise is really to go out and hold these cameras in your hands, fiddle around the features ( which I think you probably find it cumbersome ), evaluate how you feel when you hold on to the camera. For me, a camera you are comfortable holding will be a camera which you want to bring out more often and shoot with them. =)