trekkie2003
New Member
of course there is a difference... with macro lenses in general the object you r photographing is at least 1/2 of the real size on the sensor. with real macro lenses like the ef 100 you re getting a 1:1 "magnification"...means: the object size and its size on the sensor is equal.
the question is how do you get a 1:1 magni or why cant i get this magni with my 24-105.
well the answer is quite easy...1. the construction of the lens and 2. the minimum shootingdistance to the object. with the 100mm macro you can get as close as 31cm to the object only at this time youre getting a 1:1 magnification (24-105 45cm). when your distance is bigger the magnification wont be 1:1. then the magni is 1:2, 1:3...depends on the distance of the object you r shooting. in digital life today some already talk of macro when using 1:4...but per definition its not macro...
hope this answer helps you... so with the ef 100 you would also get some benefit.
the question is how do you get a 1:1 magni or why cant i get this magni with my 24-105.
well the answer is quite easy...1. the construction of the lens and 2. the minimum shootingdistance to the object. with the 100mm macro you can get as close as 31cm to the object only at this time youre getting a 1:1 magnification (24-105 45cm). when your distance is bigger the magnification wont be 1:1. then the magni is 1:2, 1:3...depends on the distance of the object you r shooting. in digital life today some already talk of macro when using 1:4...but per definition its not macro...
hope this answer helps you... so with the ef 100 you would also get some benefit.
Last edited: