Thinking of upgrading my current camera. Currently using Canon 300D, but switching to a Nikon is not a problem. Still deciding with one to get between these 2 cameras. Any comments? Pros and cons?
Thanks for your input!
YSL
Image quality both are about the same. Functionality D90 1 up the 40D for being newer. Looks and build 40D is better. Price wise 40D is a bargain now.
Kenbit ur fanboyish comments will draw flak again.
Coming from Nikon myself, issin it more economical to stick to Canon since u already started with a canon system. Every generations will bring new cameras that leapfrogs one another. Jumping ship because of a newer model is tough on the wallet.
Ryan
Well, I :heart: my D90
(obviously, otherwise i wouldn't have bought it )
But in the end, it's up to you, right? Just pop by a camera shop and test both...see which one suits you
U "upgraded" form D200 right?
yea :bsmilie:
needed the waay better noise performance :sweat:
P.S- Is changing from a 'high-end' to a 'mid-range' upgrading or downgrading?
Upgrading Coz the D90 is so much better than the D200 except for build? ;D
Well..... I have a Sigma macro lens (17-70mm F2.8-4.5), a prime lens (50mm F1.4) and a Sigma flash (EF_500 DG Super) so far........
But as mentioned, it's not a problem switching to Nikon because my nephew is looking for a camera............. : P
Of course it will definitely cause more to switch over to Nikon but I'm open to it. Of course eventually I'll think I'll settle to one........... : )
... further more, 3rd party lenses, Nikon mount are cheaper than Canon mount and Nikon lenses are the bang for the buck ...
D90 has superb high ISO performance... you might want to drop by a shop or the nikon showroom to see...
and do remember to bring your memory card.... ha ha
Sorry to hijack this thread...
What is the pro/ cons of Canon lens on Nikon body?
Looking at D300 or D700 body.