Originally posted by langzi
ppl, i would like to state that what i type here is just my opinion and without the intention of flaming anyone or trying to change anyones idea.
Originally posted by rueyloon
guys re-read his original statement again !! I can't believe at the people taking pot shots at Lanzi, it is something still open for discussion but many people try to "reverse-troll" him by making personal attacks.
Originally posted by rueyloon
guys re-read his original statement again !! I can't believe at the people taking pot shots at Lanzi, it is something still open for discussion but many people try to "reverse-troll" him by making personal attacks.
His views, I believe almost everyone will agree
"if i were to give a professional a manual SLR with 50mm fixed lens, i bet that he will be able to take better pics then a better equip wannabe."
"if it's gonna make you feel high like a professional...then go ahead.."
"it's still the pics that matters...but sadly, with PS, even a bad pic can look good..."
His observation about the "why I need to buy the best equipment" may differ from many people but still does it need to degrade to the lever of personal attacks ?
and one funny observation, Lanzi actually said, that the equipment does not make the photo, but later on in the thread, you'll see people making fun of him AS IF he said that equipments will make better photos.
No more personal Attacks please guys
cheers and have a nice day, I expect this thread to be clean by the time I return from school hehehehe
![]()
![]()
:angel: :heart:
BS, how to do the "kok head" one ?? I can't find leh
rgs
rueyloon
Originally posted by rueyloon
BS, how to do the "kok head" one ?? I can't find leh
rgs
rueyloon
Originally posted by Jed
It's true. I'm a rubbish photographer without my expensive equipment and Photoshop. But don't tell anyone cause I've been keeping it a secret. I used to take really crap pictures until I upgraded my camera, and then noticed my standard get better and better the more I upgraded. It's sad that now, I have the most expensive equipment available, so it's difficult to improve anymore as a photographer. I suppose that also means I'm also the best photographer in the world. Never thought of it that way. Cool.
Originally posted by Ninja
i guess what Langzi try to say is :
There are 2 point of view -
Some advocate "I can take better pics if I have better equipments."
Langzi advocate "I don't need better equipment to take better pics". Then Langzi explains why he advocates his point of view, and wonder why people advocate better equip = better pic.
Langzi did not say "better BODY = better pic" . He say "better equip = better pic". So equipments can consist of body, tripod, lens, filter, flash and others.
To Kit : If you think Langzi is wasting our/his time by initiating this thread and blast him for time wasiting , I think that's harsh.
Nothing is too stupid or too trivial to discuss. Is there a rule in ClubSNAP that all postings need to be valuable? Langzi's thread is just another thread under "General Photography Chat". If Langzi's thread is time wasting, I've seen more "bo liao" postings here like the "knocking head thang".
No offence guys.
Originally posted by rueyloon
guys re-read his original statement again !! I can't believe at the people taking pot shots at Lanzi, it is something still open for discussion but many people try to "reverse-troll" him by making personal attacks.
"if i were to give a professional a manual SLR with 50mm fixed lens, i bet that he will be able to take better pics then a better equip wannabe."
"if it's gonna make you feel high like a professional...then go ahead.."
"it's still the pics that matters...but sadly, with PS, even a bad pic can look good..."
His observation about the "why I need to buy the best equipment" may differ from many people but still does it need to degrade to the lever of personal attacks ?
BS, how to do the "kok head" one ?? I can't find leh
Originally posted by Kit
Of course, I agree. Nothing is too trivial to discuss. But reading what he posted, do you think he was interested in discussing?
Do you see him asking "Guys, why do you use better equipment? How does that help in your photography?"
Or do you see him saying "you know, i find it quite sad that in singnet classified, sometimes you find ppl selling off equipments 2 mths old, and the reason for selling? upgrading....or so they say.."
or
"but then, the thrend is that some wannabes here always go for the powerful equip, like D1x lah....the upcoming D100 and all that...i mean, why the need for these equip? if it's gonna make you feel high like a professional...then go ahead..at the end of the day, it's still the pics that matters...but sadly, with PS, even a bad pic can look good...
To me, that's a statement and a sweeping statement like that deserves rebuttal, not discussion. There's a difference.
Originally posted by Red Dawn
i agree. To those who find the heart to stand up for the guy, pls read the exact words he used to describe everyone else, yes, including possibly YOU
did u upgrade your equipment recently? that's so sad!
did u buy a new lens recently, wannabe?
Originally posted by ckiang
Oh no, I just bought a new loupe. How? ;p
Originally posted by ckiang
Oh no, I just bought a new loupe. How? ;p
Regards
CK
Originally posted by Red Dawn
wannabe! why u do need a good rodenstock loupe such as the one u get???? can it help u become a better photographer? why do u need a pro loupe? does looking through it makes u feel u have a better picture? if it makes you feel pro, then go ahead.....but i think it's very sad u chose to get a new one.....u haven't really maximised the previous one yet......
Yeah man. So bad of me. A good loupe will not make a bad slide look better. *sigh*CK, to tell you the truth. You have committed a sin of unspeakable proportion. Why get a new loupe when you know you have somewhere stashed aside that old faithful 50mm, collecting dust!?!?!? Like Red Dawn said, its not going to help a bit. Why? Why? Why!!!!!! Hahaha.........