Beginners Outing(Part 28)-Sunset at WDLS Waterfront III on the 9 Sept(Photos thread)

[yilin]

Learn something new... Did not realize that there is grid on the live view .

Yes. Ivan, I used both. The electronic leveler on my hotshoe and the grids displayed on my live view.

 

[yilin]

This is nice, what kind of post processing did you use for this.

#4

http://www.flickr.com/photos/52983447@N05/4975957926/

 

[yilin]

Thanks Jeffrey. :sweat: I am still a newbie that trying to exploring a little of everything.
There are so many seniors and sifu around to learn from.

Wow your photo is getting better and better liao. I need to lean from u. I like ur #1 and #3 more.

 

[deveraux]

#3

#4

Wow ur #3 pic it's simple but it's nice

 

[wormz777]

#3

This pic is cool! I like the contrast between the lights and the black empty sky. What time was this taken?

 

[wormz777]

This is a great panorama shot! Well done..:thumbsup:

Nice panorama ! Will try this one day .

Thanks for your kind comments!

 

[wormz777]

Please pardon me from the weird and lousy Panorama photo. Its my first time trying out. Still trying to grasp the concept of doing it. I know its lacking a lot of view that was supposed to be there. Those who are into this area please guide me along. I have seen some of you doing it pretty nicely.

What I am looking out for is, how much overlapping is practical? Correct me if i'm wrong, the no. of shot does not matter as long as I'm able to stitch them together right? Does it really matters if all of shots are of different height or distance?

#01 - Am trying to show a path way into the jetty and the other end of the jetty. But I think I fail doing tt..:think:

I am also new to this. From what I read and experienced, around 30% would be enough. If the subjects in the pano are all static, the number of shots doesn't matter. However, if it includes people or other moving objects, be mindful that they remain static in the overlaps, otherwise you will have problem stitching nicely.

 

[imxian]

#3

nice! :thumbsup:

 

[deveraux]

Sorry for the delay cos i'm not really good on how to link pics to CS haha ;p

1#
Sunset @ Woodlands Waterfront by EOSneuby, on Flickr

2#
Reflections @ Woodlands Waterfront by EOSneuby, on Flickr

3#
my 2nd HDR by EOSneuby, on Flickr

 

[deveraux]

4#
IMG_5035 by EOSneuby, on Flickr

5#
IMG_5032 by EOSneuby, on Flickr

 

[deveraux]

This is nice, what kind of post processing did you use for this.

This is HDR yilin

 

[Odyssey-Boy]

Sorry for the delay cos i'm not really good on how to link pics to CS haha ;p

1#
Sunset @ Woodlands Waterfront by EOSneuby, on Flickr

2#
Reflections @ Woodlands Waterfront by EOSneuby, on Flickr

3#
my 2nd HDR by EOSneuby, on Flickr

Ivan, nice talking to you yesterday !

Composition wise is pretty good ! Nice skies and clouds !

But I'm not sure why, I feel it looks abit under exposed to me.

My 2 cents

 

[deveraux]

Ivan, nice talking to you yesterday !

Composition wise is pretty good ! Nice skies and clouds !

But I'm not sure why, I feel it looks abit under exposed to me.

My 2 cents

Oh yah...it's under exposed not minor but major haha cos i prefer this type of feeling (like end of the world or hellish moment) cos this is just a fantasy HDR + pp so just post it for fun Maybe it's my bad habit of preferring darker photos ^^

 

[Odyssey-Boy]

Oh yah...it's under exposed not minor but major haha cos i prefer this type of feeling (like end of the world or hellish moment) cos this is just a fantasy HDR + pp so just post it for fun Maybe it's my bad habit of preferring darker photos ^^

I guess that is the Dramatic feel that you wanted. Well, i agree under exposed does give part of the element to the pictures.

But I prefer the Calm feel, which give me a smoothing feel when I see the pictures..

 

[skylover]

I am also new to this. From what I read and experienced, around 30% would be enough. If the subjects in the pano are all static, the number of shots doesn't matter. However, if it includes people or other moving objects, be mindful that they remain static in the overlaps, otherwise you will have problem stitching nicely.

Thanks will take note of that. Hehe.. ^^

 

[skylover]

Finally I got the time to review my own photo.

Here is my share :devil:

#01 - My one and only shot I'm happy with. Especially the calm water and reflection

#02 - Extra effect

#03 - Another attempt

 

[Jeffrey 0ng]

This is nice, what kind of post processing did you use for this.

I used HDR and the software is Photomatix. So happy u like it. Thanks!

 

[Jeffrey 0ng]

Thanks Jeffrey. :sweat: I am still a newbie that trying to exploring a little of everything.
There are so many seniors and sifu around to learn from.

Me also newbie lor. Everyone here is my sifu. So I will try to learn as much as I can. So we share our knowledge and learn together. Hehe.... (I still got learn something from ur photo so thx u so much.)

 

[skylover]

This is what you missed Skylover, if you have joined me at Ikea.

lolx.. will join u the next time..

Nice place.. Thanks Cleonbus for organising!

lolx.. Nice I like it.. maybe can take when the sky gets a little more darker.. :think:
btw.. i notice on the right the bridge is not nicely stitch in.. u using wad software?

 

[skylover]

#4

http://www.flickr.com/photos/52983447@N05/4975957926/

I would say this HDR looks like a oil paint photo. Its perfectly done. I would say its an oil paint photo than HDR..

1.

2.

perfect shots.. :thumbsup: Nice.. I like the way you frame it..