AF-S 70-300mm VR For Nikon


Status
Not open for further replies.
no. D2x, on 2x crop, raw 70-300VR on AF. :)
 

no. D2x, on 2x crop, raw 70-300VR on AF. :)

I am in Hougang also leh....I'll keep the lens in future and later sell off my D80 to upgrade to D2x future....hahahaha:confused:
 

wah.. the choice is clear! thanks for all the samples..
 

#2
2388543583_da07edfbb0_b.jpg

Is the bird dropping it's "payload" in the pic??? :bsmilie:
 

How about 70-200mm f/2.8 ED-IF AFS VR zoom-nikkor vs 70-300 VR?

Which one is better? and what sort of pictures are we able to capture in different conditions..like low light, fast sports etc.. 200mm seems a bit near compared to 300mm..

the 70-200/2.8 is a different beast by itself. though it's good in low light, it depends a lot on the individual using it. some can hold at very slow shutter speeds, some simply can't. i am one of those who can't so i see no point in upgrading my 80-200/2.8 for the VR version.

the 70-300 will have more pulling power when shooting candids but being a 'slow' lens, you have to bump up your ISO or use flash in indoor area.

70-200/2.8: good for low light, indoor sports, etc. (con: heavy)
70-300: good for candids, light weight, outdoor sports, travel, etc.


as i have a 18-135mm kit lens and 50mm 1.8 len. but 70-200mm is good for low lights and fast sports ..hmm..what do you guys think?

you already have a great lens (50mm) for low light if focal range is not an issue. the 70-200/2.8 will be great for indoor sports.

large aperture lens (2.8 or faster) do focus faster especially in low light.

looking at your 'arsenal' the 70-200/2.8 will be a good inclusion if you shoot indoor events and sports regularly but 200 for sports is a little bit limiting. if you use flash, the 70-300 lens will also be a good asset for indoor events.

why not buy both? :bsmilie:

each lens has it's use and usage.
 

the 70-200 f2.8 is more than twice the price of the 70-300VR...
is budget ur concern?

Frankly speaking i would prefer the 70-300 VR more cos of more reach and i can save the $$ for other equipment... hehe

but tat's just me... :)

that's true as you can put more money into your regular shooting lens like 17-50/2.8 and get the 70-300VR and still have change left.
 

you may also want to consider Nikon AF-S 18~200mm 1:3.5/5.6G ED for your purpose as well, it's light and versatile for walk around, outdoor esp.
 

Hi I am new to DSLR. Owe a D80 with Kit lens 4months already. father of 2 sons and like to shoot some kids photo and occasionally love to bring them outdoor. But lazy to bring my Manfrotto 190ProB tripot along.
Anybody use the AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED lens before? Pls share your experience.:)

U can goto my flickr homepage. All photo @ formula Drift are captured using 70-300mm VR.

Only cropping and resize is done only...
Cheers..No Regret.
 

I love this lens for 3 simple reasons.
1. It is fast enough.
2. It is sharp enough.
3. It is light in weight and $$$.

Hope these 2 pictures confirms the stated 3 reasons.
#1
2428076670_9e627899a9_o.jpg

#2
2388543583_da07edfbb0_b.jpg

LOL.. do you realise the 2nd picture... look at the belly of the bird... there's a stream of.... *POOP*??

lol.... if it's my photo.. haha.. i would try to get rid of that thing... hahaha...

Great shot man!
 

Holiday overseas $2000
A Nikon 70-300VR $1000
Capturing bird pooping.. Priceless.. heh


LOL.. do you realise the 2nd picture... look at the belly of the bird... there's a stream of.... *POOP*??

lol.... if it's my photo.. haha.. i would try to get rid of that thing... hahaha...

Great shot man!
 

Just got a used copy, very value for money indeed. sharp wide open too!

here are some stuff i got at SBG:

2554758673_9291faf265_b.jpg



2554848543_839f054f20_b.jpg
 

just got this lens today..weighs like a ton to me :)
 

hmmm, how can it be heavy:) i feel its so much lighter, if u think thats heavy, then 70-200VR will be like WHOA. lol.

i think its a nice balance with the d300 with grip.
 

hmmm, how can it be heavy:) i feel its so much lighter, if u think thats heavy, then 70-200VR will be like WHOA. lol.

i think its a nice balance with the d300 with grip.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top