clubgrit
Senior Member
It really depends on what and how you shoot, the camera is just a tool, it's all up to you. RFs don't do well with long lenses, not recommended for close-ups too. I lent a Leica to a friend and he didn't like the viewfinder (Leica has one of the better ones already), tiny rf focusing not conducive to his eyesight.
The page below has some insights, including size of the body. RF bodies may not be smaller than small SLRs, it's the lenses that are.
Rangefinder vs SLR
All this is moot of course if you can have more than 1 camera set. You can keep one or two RFs in the cabinet for those times one needs an RF's strengths - portability, low-light shooting, etc. like this combat photographer. Budget ? Chiif's program above should help
(that is if you can read it)
"When there were no SLRs, everyone used rangefinders - Leicas, Contax (Robert Capa comes to mind) and of course the spectacular Nikon S series rangefinders. However, be advised that once the Nikon F became available in 1959, most combat photojournalists dumped their rangefinder cameras without a drop of remorse and as fast as they could. Rangefinders are still great (I have a complete Leica M6 TTL system - three bodies and eight lenses) for "street" photography, travel, extremely low light levels, etc. But, in a dangerous environment the significantly larger viewfinder image provided by the SLR is an overwhelming consideration. "
Source: http://www.cameraquest.com/combatph.htm
The page below has some insights, including size of the body. RF bodies may not be smaller than small SLRs, it's the lenses that are.
Rangefinder vs SLR
All this is moot of course if you can have more than 1 camera set. You can keep one or two RFs in the cabinet for those times one needs an RF's strengths - portability, low-light shooting, etc. like this combat photographer. Budget ? Chiif's program above should help

"When there were no SLRs, everyone used rangefinders - Leicas, Contax (Robert Capa comes to mind) and of course the spectacular Nikon S series rangefinders. However, be advised that once the Nikon F became available in 1959, most combat photojournalists dumped their rangefinder cameras without a drop of remorse and as fast as they could. Rangefinders are still great (I have a complete Leica M6 TTL system - three bodies and eight lenses) for "street" photography, travel, extremely low light levels, etc. But, in a dangerous environment the significantly larger viewfinder image provided by the SLR is an overwhelming consideration. "
Source: http://www.cameraquest.com/combatph.htm
Hello all,
I'm currently using a FM2 with some AIS lenses. However, this is proving to be too heavy to lug around when travelling. Does anyone know of light weight and compact alternatives (SLRs included)? I'm considering switching to range finders for travelling - do you guys have models to recommend (with crisp image quality)? Would really appreciate advice on this. Thank you.
Last edited: