I've seen these too, jpeg results that is.
Funny, recently I challenged whether the new 380 could potentially deliver better quality then the 700 looking at the aging of technology and someone here held it for 'impossible'.
Now with the 500 coming out it seems that it IS possible, even while comparing it to a very recent 900. I guess the truth is hold in sensors being used. At the time where I was wondering what the quality of the 380 would be, no information was present about its sensor but once released it was clear there was no new technology involved, merely a cosmetic upgrade. Hence, no better performance.
With the release of the 500 however it is about technology. And proves my assumption is correct, slowly making me wonder what the value of nowadays camera's is. Today's performance (high-end) is like 'almost' (degrades) gone tomorrow.
D7D vs A700 vs A900 vs A500 JPEG high ISO performance shoot-out
http://www.artaphot.ch/dslrs/201-jpg-noise-a500-a700-a900-and-dynax-7d
Good to see here, A500 easily bests all previous alphas.
If you looked close enough, your assumption had already been correct, with the Nikon D90 and D5000 besting the D300 at high ISO performance.
.
does it have hd vid record feature?
I wonder why Sony came out with a new Vertical Grip for the A500/A550 camera. The camera uses the same battery as the A300/350 series. So theortically, the same VG for A300/A350 should be able to be used on the A500/A550 camera.
I guess Sony just want to make more money out of consumers.
Who cares, the whole 850 thread series is a mess already anyway, moderators should interfere more here.
No, we need an active mod here... Most current mods are all in the Oly, C and N camps/forum category.
No love to Sony.![]()
No love to Sony.![]()
You can see more activities on the other forum.![]()
No, we need an active mod here... Most current mods are all in the Oly, C and N camps/forum category.
I can envision someone in that role somehow .. :angel:
I can envision someone in that role somehow .. :angel: