A true half baked moderator comes to the scene


Status
Not open for further replies.

diamond010

New Member
StreetShooter StreetShooter is online now
Moderator
@ Katong

Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,559
You have received an infraction at ClubSNAP Photography Forums
Dear diamond010,

You have received an infraction at ClubSNAP Photography Forums.



Reason: Terms of Use and/or Guideline Violation
-------
Please note that personal attacks on any member (whether user / Superuser / Moderator) will not be tolerated.

http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=279050
-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

All the best,
ClubSNAP Photography Forums
Forward Message
 

beg to differ. recently with the OP`s opening, there is a lot of people lauding it. If he is mistaken about your motive, you can appeal against and not making an attack on him. You got the infraction for your attack and I dont see that as being unfair. So far they are as fair as anyone can get.
 

You have posted once again in the wrong section. This is your final reminder. I have moved this to the feedback forum.
 

diamond010 days are numbered....:sweat: :sweat:
 

You have posted once again in the wrong section. This is your final reminder. I have moved this to the feedback forum.

Infractions or not aside,

What does the Mod team think about this whole issue? I won't blame him for being angry, shrug.

I hope it isn't just.. Give infractions until no one complains.. That'd be a sad day indeed.
 

-_- Why is this matter still not properly and professionally solved? Banning/closing/warning is not going to solve that problem!

From what I see, there is no prove that the TS is from or promoting OP; therefore, the thread should be opened again. That's it. Very simple. Just let the discussion carry on. If the discussion really becomes a promotion, then you can have the right to shut it down. There is nothing wrong with that thread at the moment. Give the guy a fair game.
 

Infractions or not aside,

What does the Mod team think about this whole issue? I won't blame him for being angry, shrug.

I hope it isn't just.. Give infractions until no one complains.. That'd be a sad day indeed.
The fully-baked Admin team believes that this issue has been blown out of proportion and strongly urge the aggrieved member to speak to us directly instead of posting in the open which will invite unnecessary and uncalled-for comments from other members who may not have the full facts of the issue at hand.

This thread is now closed. Please contact me or Jason Ho (or the both of us) to clarify this issue. Any additional/new threads started with regards to this topic will be closed upon sight and may result in further infractions being issued.
 

Infractions or not aside,

What does the Mod team think about this whole issue? I won't blame him for being angry, shrug.

I hope it isn't just.. Give infractions until no one complains.. That'd be a sad day indeed.

The whole issue has been discussed among the mods and SUs. If any member thinks they can outsmart us or talk their way out , then they are wrong.

Anyone who is willing to read more of the threads started by the TS , they will probably arrive at the same conclusion as us.

The thing I dislike is when things are already so obvious, people are still trying to argue their way thru.

One thing I must make it very clearly, I welcome anyone to post about their feedback on any camera shop. I can understand people choosing or prefer certain shop. It may be price, customer service or even other reasons. But starting every thread to indirectly advertising for a certain shop with a riddle (guess which shop etc..), either the person thinks that a fantastic way of avoiding paying for advertisement or he/she believes the admin team here are all not smart/intelligent enough to see thru his plot.

The current admin , mods and SU team have alot of experience in moderating forums. For most decisions, we do discuss among ourselves before taking actions.

Last but not least, I want to state, we may not be 100% correct all the time, but I am sure we are 101% sure of this case.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top