*

[ziploc]

You're welcome.

 

[garagez]

great tutorial , thanz

 

[lchoong78]

thanks for sharing.
Learn new thing today.

 

[ziploc]

great tutorial , thanz

thanks for sharing.
Learn new thing today.

No problem and you're welcome.

 

[engta]

Nice pic.. and thanks for sharing the workflow.
Cheers.

 

[stanley2606]

Nice photos! :thumbsup:
Thanks for sharing!

 

[Lolrence]

I think it'll be better if you build up the snow by layers; snow in front should fall faster than snow at the back, and are of bigger particles, the ones at the back will fall slower and are of smaller particles. Then tweak the opacity of the layers so that they slowly fade off as they get further away.

Also, when you take photos in a snowscape, the shadows should be really soft and diffused.. so you might wanna use a softbox to help with that next time..

 

[ziploc]

I think it'll be better if you build up the snow by layers; snow in front should fall faster than snow at the back, and are of bigger particles, the ones at the back will fall slower and are of smaller particles. Then tweak the opacity of the layers so that they slowly fade off as they get further away.

Also, when you take photos in a snowscape, the shadows should be really soft and diffused.. so you might wanna use a softbox to help with that next time..

Thanks for taking time to comment.

Hmm... don't quite understand what you're saying. Why would snow in front be falling faster than those at the back? :think: Multiple layers had already been employed, their opacity tweaked, and the particles in front already made larger (please see post 13), maybe the effect is not strong enough?

Btw, you have very nice photos on your blog. :thumbsup:

 

[Lolrence]

Thanks for taking time to comment.

Hmm... don't quite understand what you're saying. Why would snow in front be falling faster than those at the back? Multiple layers had already been employed, their opacity tweaked, and the particles in front already made larger (please see post 13), maybe the effect is not strong enough?

Btw, you have very nice photos on your blog.

Sorry, I think I made a mistake about the speed part, was thinking of something else... :sweat:
Anyway, it's nice that you've taken the time to post your workflow :thumbsup:

I would remove the snow under the umbrella, and maybe give a bit more size variation to the snow. For example, http://www.freefoto.com/images/9909...fall-for-nearly-20-years-hits-Britain_web.jpg and http://www.travel-vancouver-island.com/data/media/5/winter-snowfall_95.jpg , snow particles that are further away are smaller and denser in numbers

Of course, it depends on how heavy you'll want the snowfall to be ;p

Thanks for the comment

 

[ziploc]

Haha no worries. This one is interesting, maybe can try to emulate it when have time. Cheers.