50mm 1.8d


Status
Not open for further replies.
deadpixel said:
Considering that Canon just came out with a L USM version of the 50mm f/1.2 (priced at US$1,600 :bigeyes: ), I'm wondering if Nikon will follow with an AF-S G version :bsmilie: If they did, I'm pretty it'd twist a few people's underware in a knot.

_
and :sweat: about what is in the people's underware! :bsmilie:
Just get the Nikkor AIS f/1.2 can liao! :bsmilie:
 

ipin said:
and :sweat: about what is in the people's underware! :bsmilie:
Just get the Nikkor AIS f/1.2 can liao! :bsmilie:

Considering... but think will have to settle for other lenses first...
 

zac08 said:
Considering... but think will have to settle for other lenses first...
which other lenses leh? the 50mm f/1.4 ah?
 

ipin said:
which other lenses leh? the 50mm f/1.4 ah?

Mebbe a 85? or the 70-200 which I am still saving for (really slowly)
 

zac08 said:
Mebbe a 85? or the 70-200 which I am still saving for (really slowly)
whoa, price wise, VERY different for both lenses wor! But SWEE SWEE lenses nonetheless! :thumbsup: ;p
OT liao lor! :bsmilie:
 

deadpixel said:
Considering that Canon just came out with a L USM version of the 50mm f/1.2 (priced at US$1,600 :bigeyes: ), I'm wondering if Nikon will follow with an AF-S G version :bsmilie: If they did, I'm pretty sure it'd twist a few people's underware in a knot. :bsmilie: :devil:

_
What's the use of such a lens? Probably good for people who need to boast size to overcome the quality. Look what they have in their arsenal and it's not difficult to tell they just think bigger is better.

50/1.0L, 85/1.2L, 200/1.8L. All of them just a fraction of a stop bigger than the biggest aperture Nikon has or used to have. I don't think I would like to comment about the quality.

My point is I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to pay 3 times the price for just a fraction of a stop more unless they are loaded and need their ego boosted. eg. "Your lengs big ah? My lengs BIGger!!" They are probably people who has a top of the line Canon SLR which boasts the world's fastest AF but using manual focus Leica lenses with modified mount on such bodies.

Often times, these are also the people who do not have any photos to show or share.
 

lsisaxon said:
deadpixel said:
Considering that Canon just came out with a L USM version of the 50mm f/1.2 (priced at US$1,600 :bigeyes: ), I'm wondering if Nikon will follow with an AF-S G version :bsmilie: If they did, I'm pretty sure it'd twist a few people's underware in a knot. :bsmilie: :devil:
What's the use of such a lens? Probably good for people who need to boast size to overcome the quality. Look what they have in their arsenal and it's not difficult to tell they just think bigger is better.

50/1.0L, 85/1.2L, 200/1.8L. All of them just a fraction of a stop bigger than the biggest aperture Nikon has or used to have. I don't think I would like to comment about the quality.

My point is I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to pay 3 times the price for just a fraction of a stop more unless they are loaded and need their ego boosted. eg. "Your lengs big ah? My lengs BIGger!!" They are probably people who has a top of the line Canon SLR which boasts the world's fastest AF but using manual focus Leica lenses with modified mount on such bodies.

Often times, these are also the people who do not have any photos to show or share.
**Sigh**

The post was meant to be tongue in cheek, a light hearted joke. That was what the big smiles and devil was meant to convey.

But, yes, you are right, no one in a right frame of mind would pay 3 times the price for just a fraction of a stop more light. However, artists who are perfectionists are rarely considered to be mentally stable. :bsmilie:

Still, if Nikon does come up with an AF version of their 50mm f/1.2, they might just follow the old pricing structure (we can hope) and make it a >SG$1,000 lens.

_
 

deadpixel said:
**Sigh**

The post was meant to be tongue in cheek, a light hearted joke. That was what the big smiles and devil was meant to convey.

But, yes, you are right, no one in a right frame of mind would pay 3 times the price for just a fraction of a stop more light. However, artists who are perfectionists are rarely considered to be mentally stable. :bsmilie:

Still, if Nikon does come up with an AF version of their 50mm f/1.2, they might just follow the old pricing structure (we can hope) and make it a >SG$1,000 lens.

_
:bsmilie:
Still no matter how highly it may be priced, there'll be people buying it! :sweat: :bsmilie:
Maybe they can earn back the initial outlay? :think:
 

travelocity said:
Around there, I bought other things with it. So got a good price overall. :)
:thumbsup: on you. enjoy your glass! :heart:
What made you buy it? Issit the price, it's range or it's quality? Care to share? :)
 

travelocity said:
I got mine from MS Color. Great service!

Your are right! ms colour service is excellent!
 

travelocity said:
Around there, I bought other things with it. So got a good price overall. :)

AP i got it at $175...lords i got it at $170...:lovegrin:
 

westwest1 said:
updated D200 pricing instead...haha...:sweatsm:
this thread being the 50mm f1.8 mah! 'Soon bian' update the 50mm lor! :bsmilie:
 

ipin said:
this thread being the 50mm f1.8 mah! 'Soon bian' update the 50mm lor! :bsmilie:

haha...posted price also cheaper then what i have...:bsmilie:

tomolo comex liaoz...:lovegrin:
 

westwest1 said:
haha...posted price also cheaper then what i have...:bsmilie:

tomolo comex liaoz...:lovegrin:
Cactus jACK said:
AF 50mm f/1.8D - $170 (CP, Dec05 - itsybitsyspidy)
westwest1 said:
AP i got it at $175...lords i got it at $170...
Same price lah can update shop and date too for all to reference mah! ;)
:bsmilie:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top