shinken said:Erm... I think you work in Canon, after you said you work in Canon?
That's all that is to it. Even if you work in Canon, hands-on experience differs from owners's experience. A "worker's" experience is different from a photographer's experience. Unless you're a pixel peeper, or print high quality (i mean high quality) billboards, shoot commercials, in which a Canon system may not suffice - I fail to be convinced, by a worker in Canon, that 5D needs L glasses, or it would be a waste of money.
Please know that I agree with you, that 5D needs good glasses. 24-85 can have excellent results on my 20D, but becomes soft somehow, on the 5D. But I hope you refrain from making a sweeping statement that only L glasses are the ones that are suitable.
I've had my say, and sorry for digressing from the topic.![]()
sehsuan said:It's pretty odd that some people lost out on the fact that you MAY want to carry a SPARE camera... and add more weight! :bsmilie:
bry'an said:I m using EF-s body. for me 17-40 good enough for holidays. + 50 mm & 85 mm would be perfect.
for me... weight is last consideration.if can take good photos, why care ?
care to explain this statement?jeryltan said:You use tripod, take indoor pic. with 24-105L f/4 at f/8.. Picture quality better than handhold a 24-70L f/2.8 at f/2.8.. so what do you think? f2.8 more impt, or tripod more impt?
+evenstar said:care to explain this statement?
how do u shoot indoor event pic with 24-105 at f8 and get quality same as 24-70 at f2.8jeryltan said:Alamak bro.. Test my England ah??
Or you trying to say that 24-105L at f/8 may not produce a better pic. than 24-70L at f/2.8?
+evenstar said:how do u shoot indoor event pic with 24-105 at f8 and get quality same as 24-70 at f2.8
+evenstar said:how do u shoot indoor event pic with 24-105 at f8 and get quality same as 24-70 at f2.8
Russ said:lewong
If you get a 30D, 24-105 is not wide enough. You need something with 17mm - trust me I have done a few Europe trips and the 17 end you will need. If you have a 16-35 and a 24-105, you have a good range and I would personally drop the 70-200 idea. You can always crop the 105 end.
If you get a 5D, then a 24-105 plus a 70-200 would probably be about right.
My next trip will probably see me with a 10-22, 17-40L and a 85 1.8.
Another thing - reduce the amount of other baggage as much as possible. I only bring 4 changes of shirts and 2 pants max and I end with less than 10kg including camera gear.
lewong said:Oh, thks for the advice. don't think I will buy both 16-35L and 24-105L now. I will probably get the 30D. So what do you recommend for the lens if I only get 1 for the time being. But maybe can match the 24-105L with a prime lens or maybe a 3rd party lens with a wide angle? But should such wide lens be in f/2.8 and lower? What do you recommend (a) canon prime lens or (b) 3rd party wide angle or prime lens?
lewong said:What do you think if I am going to use it for holiday and family....as a hobby...well may have to see how it goes.
Anyway, do you think getting the 24-105L is ok? my concern is it is not a f/2.8 (not sure how much it will affect my pic esp taking indoor pic in Europe) and if may need to invest in 2 more lenses!
lewong said:just realised, its f/3.5-f/4.5. Is f2.8 necessary?