Recent content by blaine

alright man! 400mm is really something. sure can capture the details one. salute! :bsmilie:

your photos seepay ho! damn good shots!

don't worry man! won't don't need much. use some of your creativity is enough. but be sure you are good in panning, tilting, master your flash etc.. no need technique one. just shoot! even groom not in pic also nevermind, it's creative! :bsmilie: apologies if i may sound sarcastic...

i suppose there's nothing wrong w asking for a free service. it's just that the forum people don't seem to tolerate hypocrites. it might be better to say it outright, rather than saying so much about working pros and then say not much is need from a student photogr, followed by a list of...

but the 18-135 definitely can.

hhee... comment on pics la.. model's look follow fashion's demand.

All Marvellous! #1 is a nice angle which can have less tilt you think?

i think this is the case and it's the same for D70 and D80/D200. it's almost like a warning system to remind the photographer to either use tripod or bump up the ISO.

you can get the same 67mm only when using the slim nikon CPL. For those normal CPL (thicker) you need to get a bigger diameter eg. 72mm or 77mm to avoid vignetting (and use step up ring). dump that kenko... i read it acts more like a ND filter. get B+W or nikon CPL. can stack the UV but...

good photographers charge a good fee for their shoot. good models better get good photographers to enhance their portfolio. budding photographers also need good models for their portfolio. Unless models are deemed suitably photogenic, even budding photographers might not want to do the TFCD...

if the guy is already wearing a G-shock for so many years. perhaps he is just not a watch person.. maybe he prefers something that can withstand the wear and tear of daily usage. maybe it would make him feel too tacky for wearing an expensive watch. why not sound him out for his taste/opinion...

if you do shoot into the light at times, you will see that the 70-200 exhibit flares. hence optical quality wise, AFS70-200/2.8VR is <99% of the AFD80-200/2.8 however, 'he who has money will not reject VR and AF-S' will continue to hold true.

anyone knows? maybe when connected w usb cable, the zen will read the camera as it's own data?

going by how the rest of the contestants look, think you're winning.

Ken Rockwell has some interesting comments on this. check it out.