Zhen Yi's Shootout at Fort Canning PK


Status
Not open for further replies.

Cyber

Senior Member
For viewing only....

Sori I have to remove the pics....
 

I will not comment on messy hair today. Take a look at the 3 pictures and decide yourself. However, this does not mean I have a change of heart, I still hate messy hair.

Details, details, and details, Cyber!

The first picture, what is the problem? We as photographer must pay attention to details. The folded skin under Zhen Yi's right arm pit is horrific. Why didn't the photographer see it? Oversight? Just don't care? I have no idea, but this is definately a fatal flaw, it destroyed the picture. If the photographer ust repose the model, lifting her arm up a bit, problem whould be solved.

The second picture, what is the problem? Why did the photographer pose the model with a shiny rod right between her legs? Again I have no idea. This is easily solved if the photographer pay attention and reposed the model.

And the last picture, what is the problem? The sikin tone between the model face and her shoulder and arm are so far off, but nothing was done. This should have been corrected in DI. Why was it not done.
 

the pics make the lady looks not that nice..........:sweat:
 

Deadpoet said:
I will not comment on messy hair today. Take a look at the 3 pictures and decide yourself. However, this does not mean I have a change of heart, I still hate messy hair.

Details, details, and details, Cyber!

The first picture, what is the problem? We as photographer must pay attention to details. The folded skin under Zhen Yi's right arm pit is horrific. Why didn't the photographer see it? Oversight? Just don't care? I have no idea, but this is definately a fatal flaw, it destroyed the picture. If the photographer ust repose the model, lifting her arm up a bit, problem whould be solved.

The second picture, what is the problem? Why did the photographer pose the model with a shiny rod right between her legs? Again I have no idea. This is easily solved if the photographer pay attention and reposed the model.

And the last picture, what is the problem? The sikin tone between the model face and her shoulder and arm are so far off, but nothing was done. This should have been corrected in DI. Why was it not done.

Uncle DP,

He already stated "FOR VIEWING ONLY"..........I think he does not want anybody to comment his pix lar. I think he also knows there are many many problems with the photos.:bsmilie:
 

thanks for sharing.
 

Pro Image said:
Uncle DP,

He already stated "FOR VIEWING ONLY"..........I think he does not want anybody to comment his pix lar. I think he also knows there are many many problems with the photos.:bsmilie:

Uncle Danny, "For Viewing Only", that is the biggest crock of BS. If he does not want any comments, then lock the thread immediately after he posted the pictures lah!

Can't have it both ways, only want to hear praises and not ctiticisms.
 

The first two pics seems ok to me, until DP pointed out...
The 3rd pic the smile looks a bit artificial and the pose don't seem very comfortable leh.

Post more leh...3 not enuff...:bsmilie:
 

Deadpoet said:
Uncle Danny, "For Viewing Only", that is the biggest crock of BS. If he does not want any comments, then lock the thread immediately after he posted the pictures lah!

Can't have it both ways, only want to hear praises and not ctiticisms.

Like that say not so fair to people la ....:embrass:
He also never say he wants to hear praises .....
Some people only want to share images but dont want any comments for their own reasons .... nothing to do with locking thread or anything .... it is just ethics or manner to respect his wish ...:think:
 

Canonised said:
Like that say not so fair to people la ....:embrass:
He also never say he wants to hear praises .....
Some people only want to share images but dont want any comments for their own reasons .... nothing to do with locking thread or anything .... it is just ethics or manner to respect his wish ...:think:
well, you and Danny assumed he did not want any criticisms, but the way I read it, using both of your approach, he only said for viewing only, but really did not say anything about no comments either.
 

There is a problem with some members here with self-delusioned grandeur and importance.

Someone once said "respect is not a right, it is earned".

Here is a clear-cut situation where the poster said without ambiguity "For viewing only", and someone with a self-delusioned importance wanted to ignore what the TS starter requested for.

Some respects are earned. Some forms of respect are accorded solely based on social courtesy as fellow human beings.

In case some people do not know elementary English, let me give some enlightenment. I believe this is is primary school level.

"For viewing only" means for viewing only. The word "only" implies NOT FOR COMMENTS.

"For viewing only" means that the TS does not want to listen to praises nor criticisms.

Is that too difficult to understand?

Respect? Please start by learning elementary courtesy.

What crock!
 

Deadpoet said:
well, you and Danny assumed he did not want any criticisms, but the way I read it, using both of your approach, he only said for viewing only, but really did not say anything about no comments either.

Peace man........peace.........:sweat::bsmilie:
 

cyber >> may i know are you using flash for these 3 shoots. Find your lighting very uneven from top to bottom of your pic.

My comments are given with my first impression of the pic.
 

Pro Image said:
Peace man........peace.........:sweat::bsmilie:
peace,

btw, we need to get together for coffee and catch up
 

Deadpoet said:
Can't have it both ways, only want to hear praises and not ctiticisms.


Assumption is the mother of all f****ps!
 

Pro Image said:
Peace man........peace.........:sweat::bsmilie:


Can you talk peace to those who do not reason?

Or is "peace" only on the terms of such types?
 

student said:
Assumption is the mother of all f****ps!

Peace man........peace.........:sweat: :sweatsm:
 

student said:
Assumption is the mother of all f****ps!
chill down doc...
chill down :sweat:
 

I noticed a trend of an increasing use of profanities in the forum - I'm wondering whether this is acceptable though.
 

Cyber, can ask what lens you were using for the shots? The bokeh seems kinda strange.
 

vince123123 said:
I noticed a trend of an increasing use of profanities in the forum - I'm wondering whether this is acceptable though.

huh, me? I did not swear :dunno:
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top