Zeiss ZF User List & Discussions
- Thread starter gohaj
- Start date
- Status
Well 3 ppl also can go... rite..
Can also lah although the 28 is missing.
Would love to try the 50 makro and 85.... ;p
phoakm
Senior Member
If you need 28mm, willing to let you try.
But need to set a date, I see my schedule can make it.
Well 3 ppl also can go... rite..
yes...we can have kopi and do street shoots at the same time...
no prob...we are SIC people...;p I can try your 100 makro also...:thumbsup:
just curious... is that 2 and a half lens flare on the left starting from the corridor down to the grass?
sf_kang
Senior Member
Hi ZF users, I am considering some ZF lenses to go with my D3. Would apprc some advice/tips. I am thinking of the Distagon 2.8/25 and the Planar 1.4/50 and the Makro-Planar 2/100. Would this be a good 'system' to put together? I thought the Distagon 2.8/25 would be a good travel companion for landscape, scenery, people (candid shots). The Planar 1.4/50 would be for most general purpose shooting. Then the Makro-Planar 2/100 for portraits and the ocassional macro. Would this combination make sense, since carrying these 3 lenses on a trip is quite manageable still.
Where is a good shop to get them? What are the prices like now?
Thanks in advance for any constructive advice/comments.
Fred
Where is a good shop to get them? What are the prices like now?
Thanks in advance for any constructive advice/comments.
Fred
considering u r using FX, I would suggest:
25, 50 Makro & 85...
I had tried all 3 lenses on D3 before and the effect is power! :thumbsup:
25 for landscape/scenary. 50 for portrait and macro. 85 for portraits as well.
As for shops, I bought my CZ from J316 at Funan. They are not the cheapest but provide good & friendly customer service.
sf_kang
Senior Member
Thanks coolsigg for your suggestions. I am pretty much sold on the Distagon 2.8/25. Just thought I'd get the Planar 1.4/50 for general photography and also to handle the low-light situations. Reason I am considering the Makro-Planar 2/100 is greater shooting distance when shooting macro, tighter portraits, and also a longer tele than the 85. I am trying to limit to max 3 lenses when travelling. Any inputs from others?
Fred
Fred
Yes! Those are FLARE !
Another zf25 flare shot:
nice flARE
AS USUAL WEEKH, U HAV AKWAYS SHOWN US VERY NICE FOTOS. :thumbsup:nice flARE
Nice 1 bro made mi wan to get the 25... /must resist since I alredi had a 35....:sweat: Also u got a very big n nice bedroom...:sweatsm:
yes, i use B+W MRC UV010 filters...:thumbsup:
no worries bro...yes, there is a 1 stop diff between the 50F1.4 and 50 Makro. But 50F1.4 is soft and has quite serious CA wide open, especially on FX sensors, hence, you might not use it that often. Whereas 50 Makro is consistent throughout the aperture range. I have both lenses and I dont use the 50F1.4 anymore since I got the 50Makro. There is a reason why the 50Makro cost almost double that of 50F1.4.
100 Makro is a good buy but pricey. Therefore, if u have the budget, 25, 50Makro & 100 Makro would be the ultimate 3 lens setup! :devil:
ya, he make me gian also...*must resist :devil:*
i think PS also cannot make so drama...!
i wonder if the teles can produce this too... is this a T* trademark or all zeiss lens have this characteristic... haven't tried on my 200mm yet... haiz.. always reach home sun go down already... :cry:
i just went to ask at J316...$1160...last piece...:think:
- Status
