Hello guys,
I am currently using a 35/1.4 nokton on my RF setup.
Deciding to change to 35/2 asph from Leica.
On the other hand, I am also considering the Carl Zeiss 35/2 biogon.
Please advice me, is the Leica really worth such a high premium (more then twice the cost of the Zeiss) ? Picture quality wise, will the Zeiss produce equally or on par images as the 35/2 asph.
One issue im concerned about is the zeiss lens sticking out at the side of my viewfinder (same as my current Nokton). Heard that the Leica 35/2 asph is smaller built and thus won't "block" part of the finder?
Thanks
Kenneth
I am currently using a 35/1.4 nokton on my RF setup.
Deciding to change to 35/2 asph from Leica.
On the other hand, I am also considering the Carl Zeiss 35/2 biogon.
Please advice me, is the Leica really worth such a high premium (more then twice the cost of the Zeiss) ? Picture quality wise, will the Zeiss produce equally or on par images as the 35/2 asph.
One issue im concerned about is the zeiss lens sticking out at the side of my viewfinder (same as my current Nokton). Heard that the Leica 35/2 asph is smaller built and thus won't "block" part of the finder?
Thanks
Kenneth