:nono: Vignetting is caused by lens, filter or lens hood. Firmware can never fix that. If the hood is not used, the filter is removed than only the lens is there. It is a known fact that lens tubes can cause vignetting especially at large apertures. Some lenses has more vignetting, some less and some none.I'm a newbie here, i just got my E-500. After looking at this vignetting problem. I found that it's the camera firmware problem. Mine was 1.0, I had the vignetting also. After upgrading to 1.2, I could hardly see the vignetting.
:nono: Vignetting is caused by lens, filter or lens hood. Firmware can never fix that. If the hood is not used, the filter is removed than only the lens is there. It is a known fact that lens tubes can cause vignetting especially at large apertures. Some lenses has more vignetting, some less and some none.
Maybe you don't see it because you use Auto and almost never take the same kind of images I do. I almost always use M and set aperture and shutter speed manually (especially with flash), use many times white or light background. As I understand, it is also up to indiviual lenses. The one I received after the change has much less vignetting, it is still there but at an acceptable level. The one I turned in was bad. The Oly rep did bot even want to test it, he believed it.
Yes, it is called Shading compensation (ON/OFF) described on page 94 in Advanced manual and that is trying to correct the shading caused by vignetting. But that is not a 100% fix. It says "mainly when wide angle lens is used". The 14-45 is not wide at 45mm where I have the vignetting and the Oly rep did not see any way out but to change the lens, and that seems to have helped.Actually, there is a process within camera that can help reduce the effects of the vignetting. I cannot remember the term they use. It is a setting.... "shading something"...
I think actually that it should be an even bigger problem with other cameras, unless C & N and others has very very large lens diameters.Interesting topic to bring up to the Oly guys.
I think this has nothing to do with the CCD and the shading of photosites. It is actually the lens tube and the mechanical construction of the lens. Very small deviations in the quality of work makes a difference. My new 14-45mm seems to be much better than the old one. If the lens would have larger diameter it would be solved all together. I don't mean the filter diameter but all the glasses. I also think this is mostly a zoom problem. Anyway, I can not see vignetting when my 50mm is used, but then again that single one focal length lens costs more than my two kit zooms together.So much for the 4/3rd's mount design that was supposed to reduce the shading of photosites on CCDs at the corners.... :dunno:
I hade several other issues also, like the loose front tube. The slightest touch with my fingers on the side would bring everything out of focus because the whole front part could be moved by alout 1mm in any direction (not in/out but paralell with the CCD). The new one is more firm and feels more quality built.Just out of curiosity..Why change the lens? Wouldn't all similar lens from the same maker be the same? What would have caused the 14-45 to have this problem?? On the theory point of view, any of the elements in the lens being out of alignment would cause to lens to be out of focus but vignetting??
Yes, stacking of filters has always been a problem, even with film cameras. When I saw the vignetting the first step I took was the removal of hood and filter. Results were the same, so the cause is definitely the lens itself.I saw this vignetting in my 11-22 but that's because I had 2 filters stacked together. I removed the UV and only use the ND, that vignetting disappears.
Just curious on this.
What do you mean "moves"? Do you use remote or anti shake (mirror lock) or timer? I find it difficult to use tripod without at least one of those. In difficult cases I use all three features.At lease you are happy with the replaced 14-45...I am not happy with mine. It still moves when it focus. So I cannot leave it on a tripod. Many of the panorama were spoilt by it.:cry: