I can't believe this. Have been doing some homework on the FZ5. dpreview, megapixel and dave all rated its image quality excellent or above average , yet PC Mag reviewed and gave it a 5/10 rating, citing poor image quality. Either they know something we don't or the other reviewers are all wrong.
What about you actually fz5 owners? Are the images ichi-ban?
I know the 350D and 70D are much more expensive cameras but how close are the images compared with these popular "giants"?
What about you actually fz5 owners? Are the images ichi-ban?
I know the 350D and 70D are much more expensive cameras but how close are the images compared with these popular "giants"?