So it's customised picture style for my 12-24.
I have yet to find a formula for the only sigma lens I have... Still trying hard to get it look like Canon :sweat: :bsmilie:
Last edited:
Wide Angle Lens
- Thread starter bluewhale67
- Start date
- Status
I have yet to find a formula for the only sigma lens I have... Still trying hard to get it look like Canon :sweat: :bsmilie:
U won't get it exactly like a L, but at least close.
Last edited:
Halfmoon
Senior Member
Shouldn't you just get Canon easier?
well.... stuck with the sigma for this range which I seldom use (17-50), not much point changing to Canon's version.
Halfmoon
Senior Member
Aiya, just shoot with what you have.
Just embrace sigma's colours lo... Life's more interesting with variety
Which is what I'm doing now lar...
raydio
Senior Member
Just embrace sigma's colours lo... Life's more interesting with variety
Embrace the FORCE, Luke Skystrike!
Kenneth67C
New Member
There is one alternative not mentioned a lot, that is the Carl Zeiss range of primes.
One plus point that I have found with these lenses, is the color fidelity and resolution, both of which are of the highest standard.
One plus point that I have found with these lenses, is the color fidelity and resolution, both of which are of the highest standard.
Kit
Senior Member
I'm sure many know that Zeiss lenses are good but those do not come cheap. TS got a budget of $1k.
Kenneth67C
New Member
Halfmoon
Senior Member
How much is this lens?
Kenneth67C
New Member
Depends on which FL, but the range starts from high $1k+ to way above that. The 15mm would be the most expensive.
Also depends on whether you get the grey set or not.
saw some comments on the superiority of EF-S 10-22 over EF 17-40 and EF 16-35.. ya, i think the 10-22 is really good.. i did though to go FF, but my fren warned me abt the bad distortion of 17-40.. 16-35 is not cheap..
i think for ppl going FF, maybe they can consider Tokina new UWA lens? AF 17-35mm f/4.0 with 82mm filter thread.. no sure how it performs though.. else move to nikon FF, nikon uwa lens with VR seems good from what i read here in CS..
i think for ppl going FF, maybe they can consider Tokina new UWA lens? AF 17-35mm f/4.0 with 82mm filter thread.. no sure how it performs though.. else move to nikon FF, nikon uwa lens with VR seems good from what i read here in CS..
ops.. so for nikon, uwa with filter thread, there is only AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED left to consider???
if i ever go FF, i may get D800E.. the lack of AA filter seems to produce sharper pics , but dpreview says one can see the diff at optimal aperture only.. too bad i didn't try it enough when my fren lend me one.
avsquare
Senior Member
But as a Nikon user, abit bo bian leh.. Want to buy new, it's either to buy the 14-24 which gives the best IQ but without conventional filter solution (LEE SW-150 is very expensive), or accept the 16-35mm that has conventional filters but lots of distortions.
I know there's the 17-35, but not sure if there's still new sets selling. Anyways, it lacks weather sealing (if I'm not wrong) and not suitable for those weather stormers.
The last time I enquired only two...the 50 f/1.4 and 85 f/1.4 which is $1300+ and $1900+ respectively, but that's 3 years back.
- Status
Similar threads
