Why you would NOT buy the AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED

[Beachboy]

Frankly, I won't bring the glass for travelling... but it's good for those who won't want to lug too many equipment(s).

If I want image quality, I'd stick with the 17-35 and 70-200VR

we are not that rich as you mah.. only can buy 18-200mm for travel.

Wah PRO with 17-35/f2.8 and 70-200vr/F2.8 :thumbsup: :bsmilie:

 

[espn]

we are not that rich as you mah.. only can buy 18-200mm for travel.

Wah PRO with 17-35/f2.8 and 70-200vr/F2.8 :thumbsup: :bsmilie:

I said I'll only stick with it, doesn't mean I have it :sticktong If I can own a 18-200VR I very happy liao :sticktong

 

[Beachboy]

I said I'll only stick with it, doesn't mean I have it :sticktong If I can own a 18-200VR I very happy liao :sticktong

see still dont wana to admit :sticktong

 

[singlish]

not so wide

not so VR, VRII is new but not mean better than VR, since the same VR technology may not be applied from wide to tele all the time. so VRII introduced

hi
this is interesting. have you any weblink that i can refer to for more info on why nikon introduced VRII for this lens?