You read TNP, espn? Good to see that they at least write some decent articles from time to time in between their usual salacious lowest-common-denominator gossip columns and pictures of rapists.
I doubt it The Kodak may have 14MP, but the resulting image is so noisy that it's a joke. A high ISO photograph from Kodak's own website was posted in Fred Miranda's forums, and the comment was: "it looks like I took a whole bunch of pictures with my camera phone and stitched them together".
I don't subscribe to the megapixel myth either, but at the same time I won't argue with more high quality pixels. The megapixel count is just one way we can rate the camera's sensor. It is NOT the ONLY way, nor is it the BEST way.
zekai said:For a 1Ds, the sensor is a correspondingly large 35mm full frame. The resulting quality is definetly better than all the dslr except the kodak series maybe.
I doubt it The Kodak may have 14MP, but the resulting image is so noisy that it's a joke. A high ISO photograph from Kodak's own website was posted in Fred Miranda's forums, and the comment was: "it looks like I took a whole bunch of pictures with my camera phone and stitched them together".
I don't subscribe to the megapixel myth either, but at the same time I won't argue with more high quality pixels. The megapixel count is just one way we can rate the camera's sensor. It is NOT the ONLY way, nor is it the BEST way.