cos you can SELL D300s![]()
Well, hard to tell... may be due to ease of use (less bulky than D2Xs), fast speed over the lower end brothers, high MP count, better sensors for WB, etc... it all depends on the user.
D200 have a better noise tolerence over D2x. In a wedding , the ablilty to handle noise is important. Been there and done that over 2 camera in a wedding. D2x have the power of focus but it just too noisy . it a matter of a scarfice over focus and noise handling . I will chose the latter..
No reason to choose D200 anymore! ;p
I concur. I'll go with the D3 if money is not an issue. :thumbsup:
"high MP count , better sensors for WB" ...Can anybody elaborate more?
If money no issue the digital Hassie is still a hassle to carry around. So I vote for D3 too. :thumbsup:
Is that why it's called Hasselblad? Maybe Swedish doesn't know how to spell hassle or it's not pronounced the same way if you use hassle instead? ;p
Built in CLS commander? Otherwise I'd go for D2X.
It's just as bulky if not more bulky if you have the MB-D200 on.
![]()
And also, it is weaker than d2x, as the grip is screw on and not integrated, I suppose![]()
Yeah.. but it's not that bad. D2X just feels a lot more solid and the mirror is so balanced that it could almost not be felt.
mirror.. which part of d200 u referring to?!
mirror.. which part of d200 u referring to?!
Yes.I guess he's trying to say that the mirror slap is negligible...