junyang said:I remember handling a 400/2.8 on a monopod sometime back.
Many other examples here :
How long are these man?
Canon Telephotos
junyang said:I remember handling a 400/2.8 on a monopod sometime back.
Many other examples here :
2100 said:
Wai said:wah, so many white white lenses
2100 said:Canon rulez in sports I guess (though i am a Nikon user). Still don't know how to differentiate between EF500/4 and EF600/4 by just looking at them.
nightwolf75 said:typical of newbies lah. start a controversial thread. then when people flood his/her thread saying why he/she wrong to think this way, the newbies always run and hide one corner. :bsmilie:
2100 said:Canon rulez in sports I guess (though i am a Nikon user). Still don't know how to differentiate between EF500/4 and EF600/4 by just looking at them.
Some more
Even da monopods are BIG.
r32 said:What you have to do is try out a good tripod, and only then you will know what you are missing.
2100 said:Canon rulez in sports I guess (though i am a Nikon user). Still don't know how to differentiate between EF500/4 and EF600/4 by just looking at them..
chriszzz said:Food for though : Isn't this true of everything ? From cars to houses to computers to lifestyle to beer to food to tripods to cameras. There is always something better and more expensive. Question is, do you need it ? Or just want it ? No shame in wanting something. Next question is : is it worth it ? Only you can answer it.
Some people think nothing of spending $300K on a fancy car. Others want something that is good enough to get from A to B, safely, and under $80K.
Yeah, the fancy car lets you get there in style and luxury and in greater comfort, is a status symbol, and goes 0-100km/h in 7 seconds, and has top speed of 240km/h. But the $80K car does perfectly well for a drive to the Orchard Road and back home.
dkw said:Haiyah Chriszzz, most people here are saying just buy what you need, and if you have a heavy expensive system, probably prudent to by a more sturdy and functional (= more expensive) tripod mahhh......surely you don't disagree with that? If you can show me a $50 tripod that can support a 10D and 70-200/2.8 without wobbling, I'll sell my Manfrotto straightaway. Dun need to be so dogmatic mahh.....
Unlike thing like watches and cars, in photography, paying more USUALLY buys you more functionality and is less an issue of buying style......after all, which babe would care if I'm carrying a carbon fibre tripod? :bsmilie:
Bromba said:Not everyone can afford (or is willing) to spend 24/7 in front of the computer, that's why I was quiet for a while :blah:
r32 said:Let's just say I wasn't tuned into the world of these three legged beasts yet.
r32 said:What you have to do is try out a good tripod, and only then you will know what you are missing.