N nickmak Senior Member Dec 10, 2004 #2 ryan84 said: need it to be light... must able to hold 300D,grip,flash Click to expand... No need lens? :bsmilie:
ryan84 said: need it to be light... must able to hold 300D,grip,flash Click to expand... No need lens? :bsmilie:
O ordinaryless New Member Dec 10, 2004 #3 i was viewing this thread.. http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=104922 the Pro 330 DX by SLIK seems not bad..If you're going down to oe of the shops to check out the tripod, let me know..might be interested too.
i was viewing this thread.. http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=104922 the Pro 330 DX by SLIK seems not bad..If you're going down to oe of the shops to check out the tripod, let me know..might be interested too.
Witness Senior Member Dec 10, 2004 #4 light....the carbon fibre tripods are the way to go.....ballhead can decide separately.... velbon....
light....the carbon fibre tripods are the way to go.....ballhead can decide separately.... velbon....
R ryan84 Senior Member Dec 10, 2004 #7 wshooter said: Slik 330DX + 486RC2 ballhead is good. Click to expand... how much is this combo?
R ryan84 Senior Member Dec 11, 2004 #9 300D said: manfrotto 055cl + 141rc head?? Click to expand... it seem like very ex.. lol
W wshooter New Member Dec 11, 2004 #10 ryan84 said: how much is this combo? Click to expand... Only about $110 for the tripod (comes with detacheable 3-way head) and $85 for the manfrotto 486 ballhead. Tripod is light because of the special alloy which is about 40% lighter than others like Manfrotto tripods.
ryan84 said: how much is this combo? Click to expand... Only about $110 for the tripod (comes with detacheable 3-way head) and $85 for the manfrotto 486 ballhead. Tripod is light because of the special alloy which is about 40% lighter than others like Manfrotto tripods.
R ryan84 Senior Member Dec 16, 2004 #11 how heavy is this tripod,silk pro700dx? and how much? thanks.