when nikon managed to release a few units of d800 in usa, canon reduced 5d3 by 300 in canada. but there are not enough d800 in sg now. so i am hoping that when nikon resolve the supply issues, canon will reduce their price further
avsquare said:I'll still consider abit.. the extra 35mm is very useful, but I do miss the f/2.8 at night. I may be tempted to sacrifice the 35mm for the f/2.8 plus VC and the better performance compared to 24-105L![]()
Bro, have you bought your new toy? I mean Tamron 24-70 VC. Do not ask me to sponsor ah.
Last Sunday, after much reading, I bought 70-200 F2.8 II IS after comparing it with 85mm F1.2L. 85mm F1.2L definitely has very nice creamy bokeh at F1.2 to F1.8. The 85mm is $700 more and limited use. 70-200 can serve as portrait, landscape ( like highlight a house across a lake) and taking my kids on stage or ride. So I decided to get the 70-200.
After playing around inside and outside my house for a day, I am very impress with it. It is definitely sharper and focus faster than 17-40 and 24-105. Of course it is really heavy and the white color is too loud.
then I load up Reikan Focal to do micro adjustment. No adjustment required! both wide and tele set to zero. That is amazing.
I did not vote for the 70-200mm F2.8 II IS L USM as I do not own it when I did my voting. Now I cannot vote again. if not, I will definitely vote for 70-200 F2.8 II IS.
I would say it's the sharpest zoom as of now.. we'll need to see if the 24-70L II can challenge this telezoom or not. :bsmilie:
Last Sunday, after much reading, I bought 70-200 F2.8 II IS after comparing it with 85mm F1.2L. 85mm F1.2L definitely has very nice creamy bokeh at F1.2 to F1.8. The 85mm is $700 more and limited use. 70-200 can serve as portrait, landscape ( like highlight a house across a lake) and taking my kids on stage or ride. So I decided to get the 70-200.
After playing around inside and outside my house for a day, I am very impress with it. It is definitely sharper and focus faster than 17-40 and 24-105. Of course it is really heavy and the white color is too loud.
then I load up Reikan Focal to do micro adjustment. No adjustment required! both wide and tele set to zero. That is amazing.
I did not vote for the 70-200mm F2.8 II IS L USM as I do not own it when I did my voting. Now I cannot vote again. if not, I will definitely vote for 70-200 F2.8 II IS.
Hi, I agree with you. I own the 70-200 f2.8 II IS L USM. Fantastic lens. I think I might as well lug it along for travel too...
See how it pit against the other two favourites.
Canon 70-200mm Big Battle (f/2.8, f/2.8 II & f/4) - YouTube
No contest, the mark II wins hands down. I owned the F4 IS before and this is even sharper wide open.
yup.. the wait for this lens is even worse than the 1DX delay.. this lens is totally NO NEWS and NO LEAK lol.. :bsmilie:
1. 14-24 f/2.8
2. 24-105 f/2.0 with Hybrid IS and built in dual 1.4x and 2.0x Type III teleconverters with lens no bigger than a pancake.
3.
4.
5. .....