Am thinking of buying a new canon dslr...and lense,
am a nikon fan but newbie to sigma and canon ..
Which is the most silnet focus system/lens ?
Canon IS ? Sigma HSM II ? or nikon VR II ?
any idea ?
The advantage of Sony & Pentax's in-camera modules is that all lenses become VR lenses, while for Nikon, Canon & Tamron you have to pay more to get a VR lens.
manual focus = no sound.
even if focus no sound, mirror slap very loud.. big fat deal!
Am thinking of buying a new canon dslr...and lense,
am a nikon fan but newbie to sigma and canon ..
Which is the most silnet focus system/lens ?
Canon IS ? Sigma HSM II ? or nikon VR II ?
any idea ?
Some counter that Sony and Pentax's in-body system is a one-size-fits-all solution that is not optimized for the different characteristics of each individual lens. Then again, it could be Canon, Nikon, and others' excuse to charge $$$ more each time they sell a lens with stabilization. :dunno:
Some counter that Sony and Pentax's in-body system is a one-size-fits-all solution that is not optimized for the different characteristics of each individual lens. Then again, it could be Canon, Nikon, and others' excuse to charge $$$ more each time they sell a lens with stabilization. :dunno:
Definitely not true. The SSS adjusts itself depending on the detected focal length of the lens. It's not "static".
Remember, it's also Canon and Nikon that said it's impossible to stabilize a full-frame sensor.
sorry, but what is so important about silent focus................?
seems fine for me.. but what do i know, i never use the IS lens thing before.
i think one positive thing of in-lens stabilisation is that you get what you see through viewfinder stabilised, i think..
which is kind of good, i guess.. for extreme telephoto lenses.
Try the m4/3 system, it is much quieter as there is no mirror box:bsmilie:
it is quite apparent that TS doesnt know what he is talking about even when he claims to be a nikon fan boy.
nvm, let the show continue. this is entertaining.