night86mare
Deregistered
Seriously, it's hard to control myself not to teach this &^^%#$#%^& some manners ! ;( ;( ;(
relax, you can only control your own actions.
Seriously, it's hard to control myself not to teach this &^^%#$#%^& some manners ! ;( ;( ;(
relax, you can only control your own actions.
Which of the following animals would win in a fight to the death:
[1] A Tiger
[2] A Shark
[3] A Pterodactyl
The points being, no one can answer that question, there are too many variables involved.
That's what I mentioned in the previous posting majority of it who don't know how to answer simply avoiding to answer it by posting some immature, nonsense answer and more to come.To be honest, if you want a mature discussion then you have to ask a mature question.
You'd do well to be mature enough yourself to read through the comments because there are some serious points in there. Admittedly some of the slightly more off hand comments do not help with getting to them (including those by myself) but I have made a lot of salient points in there too.
Let's have a serious, mature discussion then. These are some questions that I'd like to ask you:
[1] How would you tell which of those eight lenses was sharpest yourself? Refer to post 22 if you need some options.
[2] Do you honestly think that more than the very occasional person on this forum has had direct experiences with all eight lenses to be able to compare them? There is engrmariano, but even he admits despite extensive usage he couldn't tell you which of them was sharpest.
[3] Do you think the 74 people who have voted on that poll have really had better experience with those lenses than engrmariano?
If you cannot answer [1] satisfactorily, then how do you expect other people to be able to do so? If the answer to [2] is that people on the forum do not have direct experiences with the lenses you've mentioned, then how do you expect them to give you anything other than a guess or hearsay? And if the answer to [3] is no, then your poll is a waste of time.
None of these points are new, I've made them all already in the thread prior to this.
The best thing I can think of to compare your question is,
Which of the following animals would win in a fight to the death:
[1] A Tiger
[2] A Shark
[3] A Pterodactyl
The points being, no one can answer that question, there are too many variables involved.
No one can answer the question because no one knows, no one's had experience with all these animals, and it'd be quite impossible to say as it'd be impossible to stage a meet. Yes with lenses someone can go and do a scientific test, but I'd consider it extremely highly improbable that anyone on this forum has.
For too many variables (Which tiger? Amur? White? Sumatran? etc) read, how do you measure sharpness? In the centre? In the corner? Stopped down? By how many stops.
My very first post in this thread, second only to your original post, was perfectly serious and devoid of any ridicule. I only got funny when more and more people decided they were qualified to answer the question. The vast majority of them if not all, simply are not.
(emphasis added)should therefore be sharp across the frame wide open
In Japan, the electronics company SHARP makes a range of camera handphones...
I am fully convinced that theirs is the SHARPest, so SHARP that its even trademarked and patented... how to fight?
I think the result of the poll in this sense is quite accurate
Poll like this , shouldn't be started by any member, suitably to be brought up only by the Moderators.
If ClupSnap's reputation is substantial and recognized by all as one of the leading online photo forum of Singapore.
Frankly, what harm does this poll does that trigger all the masters & shi-fu in stepping in and slamming it so hard.. I really missing the point here. If all of us agree that sharpness is subjective, then subjective matter is a good way to poll. So let's relax and take it with some fun...