Harry Potter said:Just curious, will you get someone who use D70 for your own wedding?
Hire me hire me!!!! I use D50 for your weddingr32 said:I would be looking at his portfolio and not the camera gear he is using.
You are looking in the wrong direction.
eikin said:will you employ a total newbie with zero experience in wedding and events but uses a D2X for your wedding?![]()
If the AD feels that way... then he's probably NOT confident... big mistake. Even if ADP is using D70, a few D2X guest comes along... so be it. The job needs to get done, NOT equipment wanking at that point of time. I think the ADP is too concerned with equipment then.ambient2004 said:actual scenario i encountered:
a friend of mine uses a 1Dmk2 as he was asked to take for his cousin...while the main photographer was using a 300D...
it was quite embarrasing as u can feel that the main AD photographer feels abit tensed and you should see the wondering eyes of the relatives/friends : u should know what i meant.. :cry:
So it means time to upgrade. D2X, MTL!Witness said:erhm.... i use a d70 too....for everything....reason...i cant justify a d2h or d2x.... so wat???
Adzz said:Harry Potter perhaps like to invite flames to him.![]()
r32 said:I would be looking at his portfolio and not the camera gear he is using.
You are looking in the wrong direction.
If the photographer is a newbie, there's 1 way to get the job, do it FOC, promise a lot of stuff and empty his pockets to get his 'portfolio'.ambient2004 said:u cant really say that cos what if this photographer is a newbie..how to have portfolio??? :dunno:
though u have a point, for my case, if i love the worksz of the ad photographer, i really dont mind him using a D70...once again...provided after i see his workz...but if he uses a higher range camera...i dont mind also..hehehhe :sweatsm:
ambient2004 said:would u engage a wedding photographer who uses a Nikon S1? ixus 700 maybe?
I would think from a photographer's point of view : you can say ...its the man behind the camera...
however, from a customer's point of view, cameras used might be a concern..
but of cos, results will be the main concern though...and that will be shown after everything....basically, the camera u used during the event, does gives some confidence to the customers...
ambient2004 said:would u engage a wedding photographer who uses a Nikon S1? ixus 700 maybe?
nightwolf75 said:nah. as espn said, he needs a life (and mebbe spend less time in GL - see http://forum.clubsnap.org/showpost.php?p=1411466&postcount=18). perhaps then he can start on his journey to learn to be a cameraman.
since when is using a D70 for weddings a 'bad thing'? my wedding photographer did. and he's booked at least a yr in advance (thru word of mouth only, mind u). on the other hand, if using a pro-camera body equates to great wedding pics, perhaps my sister won't be complaining so much after her wedding this yr.
get it into ur head - the person behind the cam matters more than the cam itself. and, get a life.![]()
eikin said:why not? if he can get what i want in my wedding.
nightwolf75 said:oh? perhaps u oughta talk to my cousin. she used a canon s50 as a 'happy-snapper' in her fren's wedding. turns out she took better pics than the pro who was hired. her fren loved her pics.
go figure.
ambient2004 said:yap..go ahead then..no one got to stop u..hehehehhe
nightwolf75 said:nah. as espn said, he needs a life (and mebbe spend less time in GL - see http://forum.clubsnap.org/showpost.php?p=1411466&postcount=18). perhaps then he can start on his journey to learn to be a cameraman.
...