come let me contribute one also...
Is it mismatched aesthetically? probably. Do I care what others think? No..
Is it mismatched aesthetically? probably. Do I care what others think? No..
come let me contribute one also...
Is it mismatched aesthetically? probably. Do I care what others think? No..
A big lens on a tiny body.
Does not look good. IMO
A mis-match.
2. his muscles look too big for the set up (he should be using the set up suggested by rhino123 in post #18 :bsmilie: )
camera body and lens combi looks ok to me here (nikon 1's 2.7x crop used for it's advantage here, AF tracking may be fast enough for the dragonboat action)
However I noticed 2 other mis-matches:
1. the tripod looks too small for the lens
2. his muscles look too big for the set up (he should be using the set up suggested by rhino123 in post #18)
yes, yes, agree.
You mean this set up? Hahahahaha.
That is some seriously insane looking lenses up there. I wonder if you can actually break the lens mount just by holding the camera body to support the lens when you use such an odd setup.
The lens collar tells you where the gravity point is. What's the point of holding this by the body?That is some seriously insane looking lenses up there. I wonder if you can actually break the lens mount just by holding the camera body to support the lens when you use such an odd setup.
I think it'd take quite a bit of guts and a huge dose of adventure to try holding the setup using the camera body.
That is some seriously insane looking lenses up there. I wonder if you can actually break the lens mount just by holding the camera body to support the lens when you use such an odd setup.
Is this setup 'usable' or just a mock up? haha, looks really cute.