Wedding photography recommendation


Status
Not open for further replies.

ninkus

New Member
Hi guys..

I'm looking around for a journalist type photographer for my big day. Just wondering if you guys got any good recommendation or prehaps could share what I should look out for?

cheers
 

Me? :embrass: pm for details. :)

Regards
CK
 

Originally posted by ninkus
Hi guys..

I'm looking around for a journalist type photographer for my big day. Just wondering if you guys got any good recommendation or prehaps could share what I should look out for?

cheers

How about Kim Studio De Fia? My sister engaged his service last year and woow.. Kim's b/w journalist photography is awesomely goodie good!! :)
http://www.studiodfia-kim.com/
 

ck, check ur pm pls. thanks.
 

Originally posted by Mabel
How about Kim Studio De Fia? My sister engaged his service last year and woow.. Kim's b/w journalist photography is awesomely goodie good!! :)
http://www.studiodfia-kim.com/

I 2nd that! But his price is kind of high...
 

way too high really. especially when i'm on a budget.. :D
 

Well, when friends need a budget wedding photographer, I always volunteer! They've been pleased so far, but I'll readily admit I'm nowhere as good as this Kim guy.

Just covered a wedding last weekend, that spanned nearly two whole days. Talk about siong! :p
 

I don't mind helping out.. PM me if you want further details.
 

I dun mind too... Just pay for the film and the developing fee
 

Originally posted by ninkus
Hi guys..

I'm looking around for a journalist type photographer for my big day. Just wondering if you guys got any good recommendation or prehaps could share what I should look out for?

cheers

hey ninkus, CK's online portfolio looks very good. :)

I do suggest that whoever you get, make sure you get only 1 main photographer. I have seen too many weddings with 3-5 photographers each falling over one another jostling for an angle.

If you want 2 photographers, make sure you tell them what you want them to respectively cover, and best is if they both know each other and have worked together.

You have only 1 wedding day, so get the pros.
 

Originally posted by fruitybix
hey ninkus, CK's online portfolio looks very good. :)

I do suggest that whoever you get, make sure you get only 1 main photographer. I have seen too many weddings with 3-5 photographers each falling over one another jostling for an angle.

If you want 2 photographers, make sure you tell them what you want them to respectively cover, and best is if they both know each other and have worked together.

You have only 1 wedding day, so get the pros.

Good advice:thumbsup: :D
 

thanks for the recommendation...
 

With the increasing number of people holding digital cameras, it's unavoidable everybody wants a shot of the moment day.

I personally found it hard to take pictures because I don't want to block their friends/relatives taking theirs. So many a times I lose out on a lot of angles and shots.

For example in the ROM room, their friends took the only corner in which photogaphers are allowed to stand and take pictures, I had a hard time maneuvouring squatting kneeling just to get some shots and I missed a lot too. Fortunately their internal flash never got in the way, otherwise OMG... overexposed.

Just a piece of advice, don't let the couple have too many cameras around you, you'll get very frustrated. Imagine 20 internal flashes with your speedlight, think you're going to cry.

I think maximum, 2-3, 1 main to cover event shoots and the others to go around taking normal shots if need be.

I don't know if CK faced this problem as I? I know I lost out on a lot of precious shots on my last shoot.
 

Originally posted by ninkus
Hi guys..

I'm looking around for a journalist type photographer for my big day. Just wondering if you guys got any good recommendation or prehaps could share what I should look out for?

cheers

call terry chua at 96371976.

he has worked with jackie chan and gong li before. very experienced in journalist type photography.

:thumbsup:
 

Originally posted by espn
With the increasing number of people holding digital cameras, it's unavoidable everybody wants a shot of the moment day.

I personally found it hard to take pictures because I don't want to block their friends/relatives taking theirs. So many a times I lose out on a lot of angles and shots.

For example in the ROM room, their friends took the only corner in which photogaphers are allowed to stand and take pictures, I had a hard time maneuvouring squatting kneeling just to get some shots and I missed a lot too. Fortunately their internal flash never got in the way, otherwise OMG... overexposed.

Just a piece of advice, don't let the couple have too many cameras around you, you'll get very frustrated. Imagine 20 internal flashes with your speedlight, think you're going to cry.

I think maximum, 2-3, 1 main to cover event shoots and the others to go around taking normal shots if need be.

I don't know if CK faced this problem as I? I know I lost out on a lot of precious shots on my last shoot.

I make sure I am the first one to scramble to the left of the JoP before anyone else does. OK, a bit exagerrating, but usually I don't get their friends/etc jostling for The Viewpoint.

Regards
CK
 

Originally posted by espn


...
For example in the ROM room, their friends took the only corner in which photogaphers are allowed to stand and take pictures, I had a hard time maneuvouring squatting kneeling just to get some shots and I missed a lot too. Fortunately their internal flash never got in the way, otherwise OMG... overexposed.

..
I think maximum, 2-3, 1 main to cover event shoots and the others to go around taking normal shots if need be.

...

Actually for solemnisation at Fort Canning, i already had a bit of difficulty already, with just 1 videographer and 1 photographer (me). because there really is just 1 corner to stand at (the other corner with the witnesses really is not useable unless you dont want their faces to be in as well)

So 2 of us were really just restricted to that 1 remaining corner, right of the JOP. i didn't want my bobbing head to be in the video but i need those "I do" and "exchange of rings", "get the scroll" and "you may kiss the bride" shots which all happened in less than 5 minutes.

As for church and dinner, 2 photographers and 1 videographer is just about right.
 

Originally posted by fruitybix
I do suggest that whoever you get, make sure you get only 1 main photographer. I have seen too many weddings with 3-5 photographers each falling over one another jostling for an angle.

That's why some wedding photographers state in the contract about "Exclusive Photographer", i.e no other hire photographers and only relatives may shoot and not get in the way. Frankly, for photojournalistic style, the human elements (the photographers around)adds to the picture (Anyway, photojournalists are supposed to be used to taking photos amongst a big crowd of other photographers, right? )

If you want 2 photographers, make sure you tell them what you want them to respectively cover, and best is if they both know each other and have worked together.

Would be even better if they have 2 different type of focal length lenses to cover. Was covering Ken Seet's cousin's wedding just last weekend, and during the dinner he brought along his cam and we had a chat and discuss on the various aspects that we're covering...must say I managed to learn a bit from him :)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top