view of fullerton!

[frozenblades]

c&c are welcomed!

 

[astrorion]

The title attract me, but the pic did not show full view of fullerton, maybe the title should change to view of marina bay instead

 

[frozenblades]

The title attract me, but the pic did not show full view of fullerton, maybe the title should change to view of marina bay instead

oops! sorry!! ):

 

[alvintys]

I really like the first one.

May i ask what lens did you use for this? And what program did you use to stitch the photos together?

:]

 

[frozenblades]

I really like the first one.

May i ask what lens did you use for this? And what program did you use to stitch the photos together?

:]

thanks! but seemed like its kinda tilted ): ehhh using tamron 17-50 f2.8, with the help of autopano giga!

 

[night86mare]

i see you are having problem with handling distortion.

get a spirit level.

 

[pokiemon]

i like the first pic better.

just a few comments to add on:
1. would like to see more reflection of the buildings
2. would correct the tiltness
3. would crop away the space to the left of sands (that is not the moon on top left right? even if it is, uneven space vs moon which is not signficant in this picture, i would choose evening out the space)

 

[frozenblades]

i see you are having problem with handling distortion.

get a spirit level.

hmm did some lens correction. are these better?

 

[frozenblades]

i like the first pic better.

just a few comments to add on:
1. would like to see more reflection of the buildings
2. would correct the tiltness
3. would crop away the space to the left of sands (that is not the moon on top left right? even if it is, uneven space vs moon which is not signficant in this picture, i would choose evening out the space)

noted! thanks!

 

[grabejud]

hmm did some lens correction. are these better?

nice nice..these are definitely better than the first one

 

[frozenblades]

nice nice..these are definitely better than the first one

Thanks! ( glad that it's better!

 

[night86mare]

hmm did some lens correction. are these better?

well, the second picture is obviously problematic, so no comment on that....... the IR has huge keystone effect on it.

i will focus on the first - everything seems fine. if you haven't noticed by now the IR's verticals aren't quite as important because it's harder to judge.. so long as it looks pretty fine it will be fine.

the problem lies with the shenton way/fullerton hotel area that you have captured... it *does* seem better now, but i couldn't say for sure until you posted a larger version. details squished make it hard to estimate accurately.

 

[frozenblades]

well, the second picture is obviously problematic, so no comment on that....... the IR has huge keystone effect on it.

i will focus on the first - everything seems fine. if you haven't noticed by now the IR's verticals aren't quite as important because it's harder to judge.. so long as it looks pretty fine it will be fine.

the problem lies with the shenton way/fullerton hotel area that you have captured... it *does* seem better now, but i couldn't say for sure until you posted a larger version. details squished make it hard to estimate accurately.

ehhh what is a keystone? ehh why problematic?

 

[dingaroo]

In the picture above, you notice there is lens flare.

Cheers!

 

[night86mare]

you can google for the definition of "keystone effect". it is the reason why your IR is looking like it's tilted to the right.

the lens flare is not the problem here. thanks for posting this large, it exposes a number of flaws.

one problem is the lights below the marina bay sands structure, they should be perfectly vertical, but they are not.

also, your shenton way cluster, towards the right where it ends (right before the railing appears again), that whole area is tilted right.