only the 16-80 is DTDel_CtrlnoAlt said:its a 36-105
anybody got any idea if the CZ lenses are DT or FF? cos the 16-80mm seem too good to be true to be a FF, and this lens also dunno if its FF or DT... if its FF, think its a good buy for D7 as well... can really drop the 28-75 already.
Drudkh said:only the 16-80 is DT
the rest; 85, 135 and this 24-70 are FF
Del_CtrlnoAlt said:its a 36-105
anybody got any idea if the CZ lenses are DT or FF? cos the 16-80mm seem too good to be true to be a FF, and this lens also dunno if its FF or DT... if its FF, think its a good buy for D7 as well... can really drop the 28-75 already.
Agetan said:35mm-105mm is perfect!!! (after crop with 24-70), 35mm is much wider than 42mm (from crop of 28mm).
Hart
zcf said:but the price shall be exorbitant, more than G lens? so at least $2000 plus, well, other brand one also around that price?
smtan24 said:When the lens appears next month or later we can confirm its performance. Lets hope the performance is worth the price.:think:
this lens? its not even announced with the alpha, most likely will be end of the year or when the new 7D replacement arrives.smtan24 said:When the lens appears next month or later we can confirm its performance. Lets hope the performance is worth the price.:think:
smtan24 said:Well here is the actual Sony Lens Line up:
![]()
![]()
![]()
I still think in terms of bokeh STF wins, colour and sharpness unknown, but zeiss can auto-focus, especially for indoor.tokrot said:WoW... Nice line up.. wonder hows STF 135mm vs CZ 135 F1.8?![]()
With all the above as a caveat, when we look at the R1's optical test results, we see graphs so good that they're almost boring. Sharpness across the frame and across the aperture and focal length range is almost perfect, as shown by the exceptionally low and uniform blur numbers.
Worst-case chromatic aberration is likewise low, and the average CA numbers are lower still, indicating that what CA is present doesn't extend very far into the frame. Shading (or vignetting, as it is more popularly called) is also very low, reaching a maximum of about a third of an f-stop at the 24mm equivalent focal length and maximum aperture, but in all other cases being less than 1/4 stop.
Worst-case geometric distortion is about 0.8% barrel, at maximum wide angle, dropping rather rapidly to about 0.2% pincushion at 20mm actual/35mm equivalent focal length, rising just a bit at 50mm equivalent, and then gradually decreasing to nearly zero at maximum telephoto.