jsbn said:1) That was an earthquake no weather satellites can predict
2) Regardless of whatever equipment u can lay along the fault line, the chances of guessing an earthquake accurately down to the exact time and date is like striking Toto Jackpot with juz a $1 ticket.
U want advanced warning with that? Wait long long.![]()
A little more information on EQ and Tsunamis:
1) Not all submarine earthquakes causes tsunamis. Quoting from an article off the New York Times: There is no direct connection between an earthquake magnitude and a resulting tsunami. Not all quakes under the ocean lift the ocean floor to displace the water needed to create a tsunami. Read here. Earthquakes can be categorized into two groups: one that creates forces of a horizontal nature (called the P-waves) and the other causes vertical displacements The latter is the more lethal form of earthquakes, resulting in more extensive damage to property and lives than the former. The type of EQ that leds to a tsunami can be associated as a severe form of the latter EQ,
2) The lack of advance warning, in addition to [1], was due in part to there not being a tsunami research centre responsible for detecting the risk of tsunamis in the Indian Ocean. Historically, tsunamis were largely observed in the Pacific Ocean. On top of that, modeling tsunamis are largely conducted using data on historical occurrences; researcher use seismographs to estimate the strength and location of earthquakes and observe the presence of a tsunami. Using these data, they formulate a forecast on the probability of a tsunami following an EQ. Given that tsunamis in the Indian Ocean are rare, there was probably no data that might help to predict this one.