wished i could comb his hair.so messy!
heh.. that's good humour! :bsmilie:
wished i could comb his hair.so messy!
Hi,
Actually the pics are not bad. Lovely colours and bokeh very nice. There is potential. As Starrynight said, TCs work best with primes. That's because a TC magnifies the image from the lens, and it magnifies the lens' weaknesses as well ie. if chromatic aberration is a weakness of the lens, that gets magnified too in the final image. In the pics you posted, I don't see anything wrong in particular, well at least without pixel peeping. Unless you need to make large prints or need to make aggressive cropping, you do not need to be worried. As others have highlighted, other factors like camera shake which has nothing to do with TC performance has a bearing on image quality as well. So handholding technique is important for long focal length. The other thing is the aperture. If you want sharper images, usually stopping down one to two stops usually helps. But depending on how far you are from subject, there is a tradeoff if you want smooth bokeh (large apertures give nice bokeh).
So enjoy your new toy and keep shooting!
My $0.02 worth.
Cheers
thanks very much for the tips.
1)what's pixel peeping?
2)if my 70-200 vr f2.8 is 'so called' sharpest at 2 stops down means f5.6, by adding a tc1.7 with max apert at 4.8, so i still step down to f5.6 or 2 stops away from 4.8?
3)what's 2 stops away from 4.8 btw?f8?
4)how do i practise hand held when i have a monopod?i just rest the monopod on the ground firmly right?left hand on top of lens for focusing and zooming.right hand on trigger.how else can i practise handheld with monopod?:dunno:
5)the prob with prime is that it's not flexible.if i have a 400mm for eg, i can do any compostion other than doing it in PS right?sometimes having a prime, i maybe too near to the subject then how?
appreciate the tips.
Wah... bro... At least say BI-pod lah... :bsmilie:Its good to have a 'supportive' GF to double up as a monopod keke...
imo, the teleconverter really does take away the sharpness of my 70-200 vr lens.![]()
too bad i cant afford the 200-400 f4.:dunno:
thanks guys.very encouraging though not sure if you guys really meant the pics are sharp.
(sorry, i speak my mind and i hope u do the same.that's the only way i can learn from my mistakes).
but then again, 1/50s at 340mm...give me some credit lah!(or rather the gitzo monopod!):bsmilie:
tripod ah?sigh.....more $ to go.but if i do get a big cannon lens, i guess a tripod is a must.
piang eh...dec bonus better be damn good siah!:dunno: