alternus said:
Interesting development as I reread this post...
I feel that it is a free market. No one can or should stop new entrants who charge low. Most likely the couples they serve with low prices are those who cannot afford videography that costs more than 1K anyway (assuming that every service provider's prices are known to every client -- perfect economy). It shouldn't hurt the full-timers much. I also believe the newbies envy and look up to the the full-timers who can charge a sustainable price. They are on their way up, why see them as a disease?
And if the new blood is mass-producing equally high quality works at a low cost, then all full-timers should re-look at our own businesses. Is the value in our works justifiable for the value we are charging? Are we charging too much? Are the weeks of post-production for each project warranted? Or can 2 days of editing satisfy the client? If my business goes dead tmr due to new entrants, I think its just natural selection taking place. (I must have been sitting there like a Twa Peh Kong for too long!)
While the passionate part-timers think "Art", full-timers got to think "business" to stay in the game. In fact, I thank talented new comers who gives us the awakening call now and then. If not, (who knows) I may become a dinosaur in 2-3 yrs...
Alternus agree with you on this.:thumbsup:
To movimom, I have read your message and think that I need to raise some points for you:
- we can't be comparing ourselves videographer to doctors because they are saving ppl's life, it is life and death matter so standard charge to be implement; imagine patient have no money and delay their treatment by spending time to find a cheaper doctor, it will cost them regret for the rest of their life.
But for videographers, will the customer cancel off their marriage because they couldn't afford to pay a videographer?
- you wanted authority to step in and control the charges for services provided, but can you ensure the quality to be provide to client are all the same? Same charges could be of different quality, and not all people interpret the same 'industry standard'. Some clients prefer their videos to be plan and simple and some prefer flashy stuffs, can you say what should our government looking at if they were to quantify our industry charges?
- You need all media people in this industry to be with certs and in possession of a recognized certs......I believe you are one who posses this certs and can safely say it. Let me tell you about myself, I am a videographer/editor(for all events like wedding/commercial) for 5 years and I don't have any what you called certificates, I self learn my video shoot and edit and for a start I charged $400 until recently $980 for a wedding day(without express), initially most of my clients are through recommendations and right now it is half recommendation and half through my website. I am proud of what I have achieve now because I am not shy to talk to you people who studied the related courses because I know what you are talking about; I have network with people who are in production company and work with them even though I don't not earn any certs. I do however believe there are many people out there who self learn and maybe more successful than me, do you think a certs weigh more importance than a person's work performance?
- You mentioned young hearts who want to work for cheap, but you forgotten about older people who learn video late. I have my videography business after my 30's, consider stretching your disqualification to a wider range of age please

- Lastly, and most important...Singaporean are known to be a pampered child to let government come into control of certain sector if they want things to work their way, you agree? Taking example of property sector, due to some bad agents who tarnish the image, Government recently new implementation for all real estate agents is that all are registered under CEA and need to pay yearly agent license fees of $246.10(which previously agents DO NOT have to pay to agency or any Government body), this maybe an insubstantial amount for a property agent but you consider there are over 20,000 qualified agents out there, you work out the calculation. And what is this fund for? More like a subsidizing CEA for being a governing body fund. Think.....if this videography business were to standardize.....how much you think our garment is going to collect videographer license fee per year? How many videographers are there exactly in Singapore? 2000? 3000? And how much they need to collect in order to sustain their dept yearly?
Just my humble opinion.