I had been reading through the forums and had been wondering if having a stabiliser in a lens have much significance. I hope the pros out that can advice me on this matter. Thank you!
...
This is considering that you have the proper holding techniques. No point having IS and you can't handhold well. You'll waste the advantage.
Err... Techniques can be learned, hardware limitation cannot be overcome.
I shoot without IS/VR and I can still get my shots.
So it's not exactly a necessity. But more of a luxury and if you can afford it, go ahead.
if i were to use a zoom lens and extend it to 200m, without VR, would it be very blur?
if i were to use a zoom lens and extend it to 200m, without VR, would it be very blur?
If you are using Nikon, change the AF-on to AF and shutter button to release only.
hmm i have to say i'm still new to photography. Maybe i should get used to non VR lenses and learn the proper handholding techniques. Is there any websites that teaches this?
hmm i have to say i'm still new to photography. Maybe i should get used to non VR lenses and learn the proper handholding techniques. Is there any websites that teaches this?
True. It's a bonus.Image stabilization is a natural progression in camera technology. Like any other area, example tennis racket, golf clubs, cars etc., new technology can be more beneficial in the hands of a beginner or an expert. You don't need it per se, but it allows the higher possiblity of nailing "the" shot.