Ya, this IS a photography forum, not a bombing forum...OK, let's not make this thread into a still photography vs video, shall we? Each has its own (very strong) merits, as proven in our everyday lives when we read the papers and magazines and watch TV and movies. I can't imagine a life w/o either of the two. Chill, yo.
Now back to the TNP New Face: Looking at the website, I'm not sure who I really like. Maybe CJ, maybe Li Ying? Some of the faces look really familiar, though.
Ya, this IS a photography forum, not a bombing forum...
Not sure who you like? Funny... that means you like all lah... :bsmilie: haha... me supporting CJ (Maxim girl @ Bike Fest) :cheergal:
New Face leh... Talking about faces...If I may be so brazen and politically-incorrect (and frank!), I say the one with the largest melons would get my erm, support.
Just like our Miss Singapore Universe representative. Heck, I even forgot her name, but I'll never, ever forget that orange bikini! :lovegrin:
(And yes, I do realise the irony of my statement since this a New FACE competition. Sorry lah, but that's just me. )
It's really a matter of one complementing the other, rather than replacing each other or competing which is better, stills or video.
so its this event free or need to get invitation?! where do we get the invitation if needed..
Nvm, we wait until the event end, then request for TFCD with the girls... :bsmilie:If it's anything like last year, then the seated areas are for invited guests only. I think people who are connected to the hosts/contestants/sponsors/TNP, etc. Not so sure lah.
But there will be plenty of free standing room outside the cordoned areas, albeit quite far to shoot unless you got a 300mm lens.
For a person to shoot video to make it looks STILL, that person is :thumbsd: , but for a person who shoots STILL and makes it look like "motion" or "full of energy", that is :thumbsup: Personally, I prefer still pictures... It is easier to share compared to videos. No doubt, videos can have animations, sounds, musics etc to enhance it when presenting, but that doesn't meant that videos are better than pictures... Pictures are easier to present because they can be printed out to whatever size (of course, resolution sets in), easier to share, can be a "hard copy".
Shooting at 30fps or 20fps, whatever, and taking out a frame or two, not very impressive... Similarly, 1D MarkII can shoot like 8.5fps. In sports photography, you want that moment... But who says a 2.5fps camera can't catch that moment? One just need to know when to hit the shutter... One shot one kill more powerful or you shoot blindly and hope that you got one good picture?
Note that only those PnS or prosumer cameras got the function to shoot video clips but not in DSLRs. Similarly, in normal DV cam, you can shoot still pictures but not on a professional video cam. Motion pictures and still pictures are totally different... especially at professional levels... Apple and orange again...
Here's more of my biased opinion...
A video is a video, making them into like still pictures is definitely a no-no :nono:. They should be presented as what they are and not the other way round (eg: taking a frame or two out and use them as still pictures). If you have sound recorded or added musics, when presenting, you will need audio support or the video will not be able to show its fullest.
PIctures on the other hand can be presented as individuals, made into a photo album or sketchbook, sticker prints, put in Macromedia Flash (you can add sounds and musics too!), wallpaper in you computer etc... both hard copy and digitals have infinite possiblilities
More to my collection ;pNvm, we wait until the event end, then request for TFCD with the girls... :bsmilie:
I'll try to rush down after my test!!! :lovegrin:More to my collection ;p
To increase ur collection too ;pI'll try to rush down after my test!!! :lovegrin:
I'll try to rush down after my test!!! :lovegrin:
yay! vote for me!
hahaha.
sms TNPNF(space)10(space)YOUR NRIC
to 77877
i'm number 10 and andrea is number 16!