actually i dont see what the fuss is about. there's nothing wrong with your lca.
from what i see, it is a good copy. i'm not sure what you want the lca to give you but, like i said before, it's not a miracle camera; not all shots that come out from the camera will have the lomo look.
the chance of yielding a higher possibility of getting that 'lomo' look is to cross process your slides.
Does this pix show typical LOMO characteristics? (thot it should look blur blur, no?)
i dont really think 'look(ing) blur blur' is a typical lomo characteristic.
if what's supposed to be sharp, turns out to be blur, than i guess it's a 'defective copy'.
take a simple search on flickr and you may be able to see that there's nothing blur about the lomographs.
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=lca&s=int
it can be as sharp (definitely not very sharp) as any other photograph shot thru great lens on a dslr or a rangefinder.
i;m not trying to be an a-hole here but i'm just perplexed by your silly fuss. hope you dont mind my views.
i guess you'll learn more as you shoot more with your fine copy of the lca, along with various films and scenarios.
don't think, just shoot.